Some people think that when recruiting, companies should aim to take on people who are innovative and able to work independently while others considered they should recruit people who are able to work in a team and follow instructions.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Today we are living in an era of competitiveness where we often face challenges while recruiting people for a particular job. Some people argue that one should look for independent and innovative workers while others have a point of view that team work is the basic virtue we should look in candidates while selecting them. However, both view points have their due weightage in my eyes, as it all depends on the nature of work for which a person is evaluated. In following lines I am going to discuss both these views with some examples and will also elaborate my take on this matter.
To start with the people believing to hire innovative people who can also work independently or with lesser supervision. To reiterate the view, people with innovative and intuitive mind set can bring higher productivity as well as effectiveness in work. for instance in Software industry, everything depends upon the structure and the design of the software solution, and to achieve any success in that we need to hire people with intuitive skills who could create innovative patterns on their own. Secondly there are some jobs which require individual minds rather than team work, such as, if we are looking for architectures people with different inputs may ruin the project. So it is imperative to have innovative individuals who will work alone and in individual capacity to get maximum results.
Nevertheless, there are some bases of selection of people who are good at working in teams and are also obedient to the orders given. Firstly, tasks performed in teams are more efficient as compared to the work done alone. When working in teams, it provides a leeway to the employers to plan for successors and there is no one point of failure in such cases. For example, construction work needs teamwork, so if any worker is unable to do a specific task, he/she can ask for help from other team members and the work will not suffer at all. Secondly, adherence to the orders given will enable the overall process to be standardized as one person will be responsible to design a process which will enable many individuals to follow in a defined manner.
To recapitulate, the nature of work will be the main factor to look at while selecting people. There might be some jobs that require innovative and individual workers and on the other hand there are some tasks that require rigorous teamwork and adherence to orders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 255, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
...ivity as well as effectiveness in work. for instance in Software industry, everythi...
^^^
Line 5, column 121, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'orders'' or 'order's'?
Suggestion: orders'; order's
...g in teams and are also obedient to the orders given. Firstly, tasks performed in team...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, look, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, well, while, for example, for instance, in fact, such as, as well as, to start with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2007.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 412.0 315.596192385 131% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8713592233 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50530610838 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70088271024 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507281553398 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 652.5 506.74238477 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 41.7316108454 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.4375 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.75 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5 7.06120827912 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.34537718705 0.244688304435 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121686191738 0.084324248473 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0761815346632 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205132988707 0.151304729494 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0773035415815 0.056905535591 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.