Some think newspapers are the best method for reading the news while others think other media is better.
Discuss both sides and give your own opinion.
With the advent of technology, nowadays there are umpteen sources of news. While some people believe that newspapers are the most viable way of reading news, others argue that mediums such as mobile phones and television outweigh them. In this essay, I will elaborate on both the viewpoints as well as my own opinion.
To begin with, most of the people in today's world is having a smartphone which they keep with themselves throughout the day. Therefore, they can access news anytime through internet without any inconvenience. My brother, for instance, reads news in the cab conveniently while going to the office. Moreover, electronic devices such as televisions, covers large large amount of stories in a short span. Not only duration is the key point, but also news channel makes the story interactive by using appropriate animations and sounds. It has been observed that individuals, particularly children, prefers watching television for reading news because it is looks more fascinating to them.
On the flip side, a section of society wants to stick to the authentic way of getting information as it helps to reduce the screen time of devices. Reading news through papers will not only decline the exposure to devices, but also it will assisst in imprroving reading skills. My neighbour, for instance, is an english professor and often advises her students to read newspapers to improve their general knowledge as well as vocabulary. Furthermore, reading newspaper becomes a habit after a certain point of time. In a recent survey, it was found that more than 40% of men likes to have morning tea with a newspaper.
To sum up, both of the methods have a significant role to play on their end, however, in my perspective, sticking to roots and preserving the authenticity is essential. Thus, newspaper should be preferred to limit electronic device usage and enhance reading skills.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 292, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...I will elaborate on both the viewpoints as well as my own opinion. To begin with, most ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 355, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: large
...nic devices such as televisions, covers large large amount of stories in a short span. Not ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, look, moreover, so, then, therefore, thus, well, while, for instance, such as, as well as, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1588.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10610932476 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81793862857 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627009646302 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.9559633519 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.25 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4375 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213519656872 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0617405686635 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0514316697962 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127865253138 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0570333079958 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.