In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.
Why is this the case?
What can be done about this problem?
Technology is making life easier by providing ample amount of facilities. However, despite all the improvements and technology implementation in agriculture, people are not able to have adequate food. This essay discusses the major reasons behind it with certain possible solutions.
There are mainly two reasons for people not getting food. The first and foremost cause is the gradually increasing population of the world. Due to advances in medical, the population of the world has been drastically increased in the last three decades. More than three fourth of the total land on earth is occupied to provide shelter. As a result, we are not having enough space for farming. Therefore, the total production of food is not even sufficient for the people. The second reason is unpredictable weather because of the incline in global warming all over the world. Increase in pollution and a decrease in oxygen in the atmosphere make climate acts weird many times which causes failure in crops. For example, it rains heavily sometimes in summer out of nowhere which washes all the lands. The temperature difference is also rising as compared to the past. It goes up to fifty in summer and down to minus two in winter in Delhi. This also affects crops negatively.
All problems come with some temporary or permanent solution. The rise in populations can be tackled by implementing the law to control such as one child policy which was introduced in China. Educating people about possible threats of high population can also help. In addition, advanced technology such as Artificial Intelligence may help to develop algorithms using statistical analysis of past weather data to make predictions about weather conditions. It is heavily used in US and has been proven as a successful solution. Furthermore, medicines for the plants are available which make them robust up to certain atmospheric conditions. The government also provides those to farmers.
In conclusion, I think an increase in population and unexpected change in weather conditions are responsible for unavailability of food even though advances in farming. However, this can be controlled or tackled by law and enforcement, education, other advanced technologies and medicines.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, for example, i think, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1885.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 357.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28011204482 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97246529101 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582633053221 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 609.3 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 16.0721442886 149% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.9074480589 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.5416666667 106.682146367 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.875 20.7667163134 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.70833333333 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 3.4128256513 322% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149275508121 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0377081627319 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0436918412466 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0945576064296 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0203731932908 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 50.2224549098 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.75 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.