Today more and more tourists are visiting places where conditions are difficult such as the Sahara desert or the Antarctic.
What are the benefits and disadvantages for tourists who visit such places?
Nowadays, people are inclined on visiting locations which are far off in the nature and are difficult to access. It gives them a sense of motivation to reach to their destination and explore the same. Although this is true, there are always two sides to one story and hence there are always pros and cons about doing this. Let us discuss it furthermore in detail.
People visit difficult locations for two reasons mainly. It is either to explore or do some good in the community. For instance, people have been visiting villages of Africa where the natives are underprivileged. There are so many NGOs who take volunteers from all around the world to help the people in need. They held their workshops or small trips giving the natives the variety of things like knowledge, proper medical care, helping them create a better community and so on. This is not just true for Africa, there are many people who visit challenging locations and provide the locals of that area with whatever they require.
On the contrary, there might be adverse effects of tourists or people visiting such places. For example, if people are visiting awkward locations and trying to gather information about those places, then the people may learn something which they’re not supposed to. They may find something valuable pertaining to that region and may try to exploit it for their own profit. It might not be good for the community residing there as it may obstruct their way of living.
In conclusion, it is clear that people visiting such places may or may not chose for the betterment of that location. Sometimes it might just be better to leave these locations as is and not to meddle in between.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, hence, if, may, so, then, for example, for instance, in conclusion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1401.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83103448276 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48395804361 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.541379310345 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 437.4 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.4626842642 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.5625 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.125 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174211905777 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0618818259661 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0703922487869 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105621344167 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0377561065333 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.