Wealthy nations should assist poorer countries with humanitarian relief during natural disasters. Do you agree or disagree.
It is argued that the developed world should help developing nations with important resources during a natural calamity. This essay agrees with this statement because it’s their moral responsibility to do so and they also have the resources available to help others in time of need.
It is the moral responsibility of the developed nations to give back what they have amassed through lies and deceit over centuries. Most of these nations have reached where they are today because of the ample wealth and natural resources they looted from their colonies for centuries. One of the main reasons why European nations started searching for conquerable land was because they had run out of gold and were overpopulated. Once this planned and effective means of looting another land in a systematic way got going, the European nations never looked back. A recent study found that in the 200 years that the British East India Company ruled over India, they amassed approximately 45 Trillion Dollars worth of wealth.
Developed nations also have access to important life saving resources and technology. During any calamity or a disaster there are various kinds of help that the affected community might need. They might need expert guidance on disaster management, or they might need life saving drugs and doctors who have been trained in techniques to work in affected areas or they just might need food and other basic necessities. A poor nation might not have access to all these important resources readily, and even if they do they might not be enough. Since wealthy countries already have access to all of these it just makes sense to share it with others in their time of need. For example The Dutch Earthquake Relief Team helped saved approximately 2000 lives during the 2001 earthquake in Gujarat, India.
In conclusion, during a natural calamity when poorer nations won’t be able to fend for themselves it is the moral obligation of the rich countries to help them because they have the scientific expertise and resources to be able to do so.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 51, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to develop' or 'develop'.
Suggestion: to develop; develop
...ed that the developed world should help developing nations with important resources during...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 493, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a systematic way" with adverb for "systematic"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...effective means of looting another land in a systematic way got going, the European nations never l...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 399, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessities'.
Suggestion: necessities
... or they just might need food and other basic necessities. A poor nation might not have access to...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 542, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...en if they do they might not be enough. Since wealthy countries already have access t...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, so, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1716.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 342.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01754385965 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57626068432 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526315789474 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 533.7 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5319224155 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.571428571 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4285714286 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.28571428571 7.06120827912 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17822476169 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.067942257083 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0513456754494 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125440532177 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0480993060643 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.