When a country develops its technology, the traditional skills and ways of life die out. It is pointless to try and keep them alive. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
In the modern day, it is impossible for a country to develop without making advances in scientific and technological field. but in its bid to keep pace with the developmental trends, is it rational to obliterate its age-long traditions? Definitely no.
To begin with, the influence of technology is ubiquitous. there is hardly any field where technology has not had its footprint. To a great extent, it has become the need of the hour as we currently live in a populous world where resources are depleting ever so rapidly. To meet our basic necessities of food and shelter, there is no way we can achieve these ends if we don't resort to mass production. Considering ploughing fields by buffaloes even now, for example, will not get us the yield to meet our demands for food. This is why farmers have made a sshift from traditional methods to a more mechanised extensive farming.
However, if a great nation has to stand out in terms of cultural identity, it has to preserve some of its traditions. After all use of technology is global and is not distinctive of any culture. To illustrate, America is a superpower for its adoption of technology and industrialization, however there are other countries such as India and China which are marked by people across the world for having a profound cultural heritage and ancient civilization. it is therefore, indispensable for such countries to preserve their traditions which gives them a unique identity in the world. Moreover, the government should not only encourage the production of handicrafts and other fine arts but also promote the manual weaving textile industry, which probably produces cloth items of a very quality. such promotions will also help local communities to sustain their livelihood by generating good income.
In conclusion, countries have every reason to make inroads in the scientific arena and develop industries. however, a conscious effort should be made where possible to promote our ancient traditions which has a profound influence on our national identity and recognition.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 125, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
... in scientific and technological field. but in its bid to keep pace with the develo...
^^^
Line 3, column 59, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
... influence of technology is ubiquitous. there is hardly any field where technology ha...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 283, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessities'.
Suggestion: necessities
... depleting ever so rapidly. To meet our basic necessities of food and shelter, there is no way we...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 370, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... no way we can achieve these ends if we dont resort to mass production. Considering ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 457, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...ural heritage and ancient civilization. it is therefore, indispensable for such co...
^^
Line 5, column 795, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Such
...produces cloth items of a very quality. such promotions will also help local communi...
^^^^
Line 7, column 108, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...cientific arena and develop industries. however, a conscious effort should be made wher...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, after all, as to, for example, in conclusion, such as, to begin with, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1724.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13095238095 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03204727166 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589285714286 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 555.3 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.5787263523 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.75 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131451455972 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0405982367685 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0394863182113 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0853966904042 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0388454573311 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.