Which way do you prefer to spend time: with a small number of close friends or with many friends?
Compare these two views.
People with different behavioral traits have different preferences of the groups of friends they want to hang out with. This essay chalks out the difference between people who prefer to be with larger groups versus the ones who prefer smaller groups of friends.
One of the many benefits of being with close friends is not only can you share your happiness with them but also your troubles and grief. They have been with you through your thick and thin and hence know how to handle you at the time of trouble. For instance, my brother, who is an Introvert by nature, would never prefer being with larger groups as he would not want to intrude into his privacy and would not be comfortable sharing his space with a lot of people.
On one hand your close friends understand the ‘in and out’ of you, on the other hand, being with larger group of friends give you the benefit of doing a lot of group activities/parties that won’t be possible with less people. There would always be someone available for you when you need him or her. On the contrary to my brother’s preference, I, being an Extrovert, always choose to be with a lot of friends as it gives me the chance to connect with different people having different mindsets and perceptions. And lastly, there is always one voice when it comes to taking any decision and we have hardly any feelings of insecurity among us. In fact, there’s never a dull moment when all of us catch up with one another and many of my other friends and acquaintances envy our relationship.
Although both the scenarios have their own advantages, it totally depends upon the individual and his or her choice to hang out with friends. Rather than considering the number of friends you have, comfort of sharing your personal space and time should be considered as important.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
People with different behavioral traits ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ho prefer smaller groups of friends. One of the many benefits of being with c...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ring his space with a lot of people. On one hand your close friends understan...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 239, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun people is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...arties that won't be possible with less people. There would always be someone a...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...acquaintances envy our relationship. Although both the scenarios have their o...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, lastly, so, for instance, in fact, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1519.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76175548589 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61932063656 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532915360502 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 450.9 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.9662999749 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.583333333 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5833333333 20.7667163134 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.58333333333 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295885879074 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125850272119 0.084324248473 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0697787093716 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192749642594 0.151304729494 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.039043262764 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 78.4519038076 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.