Whoever controls the media also controls opinions and attitudes of the people and there is little can be done to rectify this.
News running in the media-industry affects everyone and helps to form an opinion about any on-going issue. Although few individuals believe that media-bosses control the news and in turn audience thoughts and point of views, I disagree with this statement and will provide my view with examples.
Those who advocate that people controlling the broadcasting organizations play an important role in its reporting, may argue that most of these businessman is having political affiliations and would not like to ire them. For instance, a media company with connections to the party 'A' can highlight news showing party 'B' in bad light. Similarly, any news can get removed for some wrongdoing immediately. Moreover, as news is run throughout the day, a major chunk of people will watch it sometime and slowly start forming an outlook about it.
In my view, at the end of the day, even media is a business and has to make profits. Interfering after an extent will go against the public image of that company and very soon it will start losing trust in people's eyes. No-one will want that to happen since it directly impacts margins. Additionally, in today's world news anchors are more supreme and are seen as role models since they report fearlessly and are the face of the company. For example, a news channel with the name Republic World runs in the name of Mr Arnab Goswani and no one actually cares who sits on the board of directors. Common sense prevails and viewers are smart enough to decide what is right and what is wrong.
In conclusion, despite the political affiliations individuals owning media businesses have, we must take into consideration the profits these businesses have to make and the aura news anchors have to keep. Personally, I feel that for any business maintaining profits and image is more prominent.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 92, Rule ID: ON-GOING[1]
Message: Did you mean 'ongoing'?
Suggestion: ongoing
... and helps to form an opinion about any on-going issue. Although few individuals believe...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 139, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this businessman' or 'these businessmen'?
Suggestion: this businessman; these businessmen
...n its reporting, may argue that most of these businessman is having political affiliations and wo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, look, may, moreover, similarly, so, as to, for example, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1522.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94155844156 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74517163024 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603896103896 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.9610811609 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.714285714 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07142857143 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114469745954 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0361366317803 0.084324248473 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0356365101618 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0731200758411 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0517755697394 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.