Young people are leaving their homes from rural areas to study or work in the cities.
What are the reasons?
Do advantages of this development outweigh its disadvantages?
Due to technological advances in urban areas, youth is relocating from their villages and underdeveloped towns to metro cities. In this essay, I shall examine research from various sources to discuss the cause of this movement followed by its merits and demerits.
To begin with, teenagers as well as young adults are enticed by a plethora of career prospects in big cities. This is because the dearth of resources in rural areas caps the number of opportunities for the people living there. To exemplify, recent research by Harvard shows that in developed cities educational institutes, as well as IT companies, are 20 times more than in small villages and towns. Consequently, to get employed in Multi-National Companies people move to metropolitan areas so that they can study in a finer environment and prepare for their respective jobs in advance.
Although this relocation ameliorates the educational and employment opportunities, it also has numerous drawbacks. For instance, over-crowded places because of the movement of a vast array of the population in some areas, which requires plenty of residential estates. Thus, as a result of deforestation, environmental problems arise. Moreover, air pollution due to increased use of motor vehicles for the commute is also a major problem. However, these issues could be tackled by the government by encouraging the use of public transport and constructing condominiums for residential purposes. Seen in this light, it is almost certain that the advantages of this development are far more than the disadvantages.
To conclude, despite the environmental problems of the shifting of young people to metropolitan areas, which can be resolved with a proactive approach in the future, the benefits it provides to young people proliferate the economic growth.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 402, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... to increased use of motor vehicles for the commute is also a major problem. However, these...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, however, if, moreover, so, thus, well, for instance, as a result, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1533.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41696113074 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22002173894 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.590106007067 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.3068531385 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.923076923 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7692307692 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.53846153846 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208733267594 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0615038535406 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0529224213249 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116059873208 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0418254570704 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.98 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.