The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily (not mine)
Over the past years, the issue of whether it is more important to be able to maintain friendships with a limited number of people over a long period of time or it is more crucial to have the ability to make many new friends for happiness has received a great deal of attention from psychologists and sociologists. Although some may say that if a person is able to make a lot of friends, he or she will not be alone any time; so that person is happy. I, as well as many others, believe that a person could be happy by having good friends, not many friends, therefore, the ability for maintaining a friendship is more important.
First of all, an important reason why being able to keep old friends over a long period of time is more crucial is that old friends know each other better. Many psychologists mention that people are happy with friends, who know how should behave in different conditions. For example, good friends due to their awareness of each other's habits, know that in what way they must react with their friend when they are sad or angry. Thus, as the old friend have more time to know each other better, they are more important for people's happiness than new friends.
A further reason why the ability to maintain friendship with a small number of old friends is more important than finding new friends is that old friend have much more things in common to share with each other. All of us spend most of the time that we are with our friends for reviewing the old memories whit each other, and really enjoy this feeling. On the other hand, new friends do not have such as these memories with each other, so they could not experience this happiness feeling when they are together.
Finally, it is occasionally said that it is more important to maintain old friendships because finding and making good friends is very hard. It is commonly said by sociologists that building a good relationship with others is a time-consuming procedure, and it is also very hard to find friends that we could have happy relation with them. Consequently, it is better to maintain our relationship with a few number of good friends than trying to find new ones which may not be as good as the old friends.
To sum up, considering the ideas presented in the paragraphs above, I personally believe that the ability to maintain friendships with small number or people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily, chiefly due to the hard procedure of finding good friends and the importance of old friends in our happiness.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 143, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... a limited number of people over a long period of time or it is more crucial to have the abili...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 82, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ng able to keep old friends over a long period of time is more crucial is that old friends kno...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 62, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
...the ability to maintain friendship with a small number of old friends is more important than find...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 404, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun number seems to be countable; consider using: 'few numbers'.
Suggestion: few numbers
...ter to maintain our relationship with a few number of good friends than trying to find new...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 171, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...with small number or people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, finally, first, if, may, really, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, such as, as well as, first of all, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 15.1003584229 179% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2133.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 461.0 407.700716846 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62689804772 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63367139033 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56189834965 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.399132321041 0.524837075471 76% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 640.8 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 20.1344086022 159% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 71.4262856777 48.9658058833 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.357142857 100.406767564 152% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.9285714286 20.6045352989 160% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1428571429 5.45110844103 204% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.518225293723 0.236089414692 220% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.218885034089 0.076458572812 286% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.161795914378 0.0737576698707 219% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.359281877932 0.150856017488 238% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.136765653264 0.0645574589148 212% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 11.7677419355 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.92 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.17 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.24 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 86.8835125448 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.002688172 180% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.0537634409 147% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.247311828 176% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.