agree or disagree? Television advertising directed toward young children should not be allowed
Advertising is a vital way to sell goods and services these days. Advertisements target anyone who is able to purchase objects that companies sell. Companies produce advertisements for children rapidly while many believe their action is wrong and can cause many damages to children. As far as I am concerned, authorities should make laws which stop firms from publishing advertisements for children.
First of all, children do not have a proper rational thinking ability which lets them make a difference between reality and advertisement; therefore, they might have the foreseeing of need for those commercial goods even though those goods can have serious repercussions for their health. For example, potato chips are harmful to children due to the fact that it can cause obesity and diabetes in youngsters and toddlers, whereas commercial advertisements make the illusion that demonstrates potato chips are full of vitamins.
Moreover, these advertisements should reach children somehow, so the producers try to show those on television. Watching television is not suitable for young adults because of the damage that it causes to their eyes. Nevertheless, companies try to make children watch television in order to watch their advertisements.
Finally, advertisements overshadow the fact that parents should have the authority to choose what is right or wrong for their children. Advertisements not only is not enlightenment for parents but also it has a destructive effect on their verdicts. So, in order to prevent parents from this misunderstood caused by advertisements, governments should stop companies advertising activities.
In conclusion, television advertisements are neither useful nor honest; consequently, they should be stopped by the authorities. Parents should understand the fact that advertisements are made by companies to make them eager buying their products. For the last words, if I had a child, I would not allow them to watch advertising programs even just for a second.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, first, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, whereas, while, for example, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 52.1666666667 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1706.0 1977.66487455 86% => OK
No of words: 307.0 407.700716846 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55700325733 4.8611393121 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26601772761 2.67179642975 122% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 212.727598566 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.547231270358 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 618.680645161 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.311481629 48.9658058833 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.733333333 100.406767564 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4666666667 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.86666666667 5.45110844103 181% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237528757161 0.236089414692 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0948993966052 0.076458572812 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0442564187156 0.0737576698707 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149162815642 0.150856017488 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0538368995878 0.0645574589148 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 11.7677419355 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 10.9000537634 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 86.8835125448 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.