Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Essay topics:

Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people.

Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

One's opinion has the power to shift the paradigm. When ten percent of the population holds an unshakable belief, people's belief will begin to adopted by the majority of the community. Evidently, people need only one people to change the group of ten, and the ten will begin to change the entire modus of operation for hundred to shift. The disagreement I choose for the topic telling the truth is the most important consideration for great relation between people can also change the paradigm. Therefore I will provide two reasons to prove the power to change others' opinion with right reasons.

To begin with, telling the truth is not always important. Sometimes, it is better to be in a state of ignorance because some fact might make people puzzled and cause negative effect. For example, if some patient are in the serious disease like cancer, he would be better not to know about it. He can be cured by belief to live. However, after knowing he will soon dead and give up to live, there is no hope for him to live anymore.

In addition, sometimes it is better to telling the lie to other people because it can improve relationship between people. Praise to others can make other people feel happy if praise is not sincere and even other people know it is not sincere. For instance, when I bought a new clothe with quixotic style, my best friend praised that this clothe was suit for me. I know it was not the true but feel better after conversation. This example clearly illustrates that lie praise can helpful to improve relation between people.

Opinions are the medium between the knowledge and the ignorance. In such a case, man must struggle to win a tug-of-war with the power of knowledge to make opinion into the reality. I have written logic of telling the truth is not always good and telling the false can also improve the relationship between people to make my reasoning for the topic people must telling the truth to improve relationship between people. It's time to blow the final whistle.

Votes
Average: 6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: One's
Ones opinion has the power to shift the para...
^^^^
Line 1, column 319, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a hundred'.
Suggestion: a hundred
...hange the entire modus of operation for hundred to shift. The disagreement I choose for...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 495, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...en people can also change the paradigm. Therefore I will provide two reasons to prove the...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 433, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ere is no hope for him to live anymore. In addition, sometimes it is better to t...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 524, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ful to improve relation between people. Opinions are the medium between the know...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in addition, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1663.0 1977.66487455 84% => OK
No of words: 353.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71104815864 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43393393081 2.67179642975 91% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 212.727598566 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.490084985836 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 532.8 618.680645161 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.5398651782 48.9658058833 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.5263157895 100.406767564 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5789473684 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.84210526316 5.45110844103 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173710032264 0.236089414692 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0546861426588 0.076458572812 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0867465479782 0.0737576698707 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108448175479 0.150856017488 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0662772005178 0.0645574589148 103% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 11.7677419355 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 10.9000537634 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.44 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 86.8835125448 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.