The dreams are meant to be achieved if you are willing to invest everything into it. People should always dream beyond their current abilities, and set realistic short term goals to achieve them. Personally, I believe that people should target ambitious dreams rather than just thinking about achievable goals. I believe this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
Firstly, if people had limited themselves within their current skill or ability, humanity would not have progressed this far. Nowadays, people are thinking about space wars, a thing which can only be considered as fiction in the last decade. For instance, Elon musk known as the father of artificial intelligence is known to be one such individual who has never restricted his abilities into one single domain. Initially, he started with creating PayPal, an online transaction platform that was sold for more than 50 million dollars. Later on, through his current holdings, he dreamt of starting regular space flights, that will help common people to experience outer space. It failed miserably during the first three trial launches, but going forward he was able to successfully complete the trail with the fourth launch. He was also earlier criticized by NASA that something like is not possible in near future. If he had limited himself to just being a normal businessman, then a journey like this would not have been possible.
Secondly, by setting up ambitious goals, you are forcing yourself into trying new things. There might be a possibility that you are good at something, which you had earlier thought was never possible. My own experience is compelling evidence for this. I started my journey as an engineer and went on to work for multiple MNCs during my early 20s. I was also involved in the field of music production. I started this as a side hustle, and going forward wanted to do this full time. I was turned down by multiple label companies saying that your background doesn't match our requirements. Initially, I thought of giving up, but being determined enough, I was able to score multiple platinum records and was later signed by Sony Music. This experience taught me that we should not limit ourselves to something that is well within our reach but should expand our horizon.
In conclusion, setting up goals that are beyond your current ability, forces us to try new things and seek different perspective towards life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 402, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...olved in the field of music production. I started this as a side hustle, and goin...
^
Line 5, column 471, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: fulltime
...le, and going forward wanted to do this full time. I was turned down by multiple label co...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 482, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ng forward wanted to do this full time. I was turned down by multiple label compa...
^
Line 5, column 556, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...l companies saying that your background doesnt match our requirements. Initially, I th...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, then, well, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 15.1003584229 166% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 56.0 43.0788530466 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2039.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 406.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02216748768 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48881294772 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58309101531 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 212.727598566 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598522167488 0.524837075471 114% => OK
syllable_count: 605.7 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.7102049975 48.9658058833 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.6818181818 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4545454545 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.18181818182 5.45110844103 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0810611084316 0.236089414692 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0242104641956 0.076458572812 32% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0486182864771 0.0737576698707 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0649130889883 0.150856017488 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0727247278853 0.0645574589148 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 11.7677419355 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 86.8835125448 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.