The perceived greatness of any political leader has more to do with the challenges faced by that leader than with any of his or her inherent skills and abilities
The perceived greatness or weakness is determined greatly by the intensity of challenges faced by an individual in his political career. These challenges give public the view about the extremities of leader’s ineptitude. I completely agree with statement that to perceive greatness of any political leaders has more to do with the challenges faced by that leader than with any of his or her inherent skills and abilities and support my position for the following reasons.
Challenges are the rhetorical issues that are met by a political leaders in his career lifetime or the period served for the same. The way a leader tackles the issue can serve a great purpose in giving public the extremities that leader could go or how well is the leader performing in such difficult situations. Is he thinking, outside the box or just using conventional methods to provide solutions for these issues. In a day-to-day life of many political leaders, they have to face many such instances where these inherent skills or abilities, he/she had developed won’t produce desired solutions and would require expanding his thinking capabilities over the edge to find the most effective strategies that could produce required effect. For, example in the wake of a natural disaster when a huge amount of resources and many lives are at risk and therefore requires a quick response at the earliest, the decisions taken by the leader over minimising such losses would be a perfect example of depicting how well the leader is able to tackle a unforthcoming task at his hand.
Secondly, the inherent skills and capabilities that a leader has developed over his lifetime may or may not be required in many such cases and these challenges would require a mix set of many such abilities combined along with decision making abilities that could have been only measured if the certain task requires a leader to go beyond his limits or leave out of the comfort zone that he bears while holding the office.
Although, there are certain cases when only these skills would be required for a particular such as if a leader had earlier been skilled in relationship building and through these abilities he has been ask to drive an economic growth, which requires talking to the leaders of other such countries which could provide economic stability or jobs in case. But any of such case would also require numerous challenges that he/she does not posses and could have only been acquired through battling over similar challenges in the past and learning from its weaknesses.
In summary, the political greatness of a leader certainly depends on his inherent skills and abilities to make impactful decisions, but any of such task would also require making decisions that may not be present within the gamut of skills and posses and thus would depend on his experience from the past after facing wide varieties of challenges and learning from its drawbacks.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 66, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'leader'?
Suggestion: leader
...ical issues that are met by a political leaders in his career lifetime or the period se...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1051, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...g how well the leader is able to tackle a unforthcoming task at his hand. Se...
^
Line 13, column 203, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'asked'.
Suggestion: asked
...and through these abilities he has been ask to drive an economic growth, which requ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, while, in summary, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 14.8657303371 168% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 58.6224719101 116% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2462.0 2235.4752809 110% => OK
No of words: 488.0 442.535393258 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04508196721 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70007681154 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69410094925 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.46106557377 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 780.3 704.065955056 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 40.0 23.0359550562 174% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 111.999875992 60.3974514979 185% => OK
Chars per sentence: 205.166666667 118.986275619 172% => OK
Words per sentence: 40.6666666667 23.4991977007 173% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.58333333333 5.21951772744 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.430333340662 0.243740707755 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.184774912686 0.0831039109588 222% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.192477825727 0.0758088955206 254% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.289476547218 0.150359130593 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.214439152701 0.0667264976115 321% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.7 14.1392134831 161% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.88 48.8420337079 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.9 12.1743820225 155% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.9 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.8971910112 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.0 11.2143820225 161% => OK
text_standard: 23.0 11.7820224719 195% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.