In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions.
Some people insist that beginners have better potential to bring crucial contributions to a field as they have a fresh point of view. However, I do not agree with that. I insist that majority of important contributions would be made by experts not beginners.
Firstly, experts know well about a field. To be specific, experts are those who have studied or worked in a specific field for a long time and have accumulated vast knowledge in the field. In other words, they know well about current issues and previous attempts to resolve the issues. Thus, they will be able to set a desirable goal to improve current situations and suggest possible solutions that have not been tried yet. For this reason, I believe experts would have better chances to make significant contributions to a field when compared to beginners.
Secondly, experts have great insight into a field. Experts have handled or observed varied situations in a field. It means they are aware of the list of possible situations and manuals to manage them. With this knowledge, even if they face a new accident, they will be able to easily understand the problematic situation and come up with possible solutions based on their previous experiences. Therefore, experts will make significant contributions to many fields, especially where agility is important.
It is fact that there were beginners who have made significant contributions in a field. However, for general cases, I believe that experts will have better potential to significantly contribute to a field for the reasons I abovementioned.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 43.0788530466 56% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 52.1666666667 61% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.0752688172 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1314.0 1977.66487455 66% => OK
No of words: 256.0 407.700716846 63% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1328125 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.48103885553 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93640895629 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 212.727598566 63% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5234375 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 411.3 618.680645161 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.8890520391 48.9658058833 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.6 100.406767564 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0666666667 20.6045352989 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 5.45110844103 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226988622942 0.236089414692 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.096370527017 0.076458572812 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0712727578321 0.0737576698707 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162663549515 0.150856017488 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0224997769414 0.0645574589148 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 11.7677419355 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 86.8835125448 63% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
More content wanted.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.