Children over the age of 15 should be allowed to vote

Essay topics:

Children over the age of 15 should be allowed to vote.

There is no shortage of debate about whether the children above the age of 15 should be given the right to vote or not. In my opinion, It's more advantageous to not allow children of these age groups to vote. I think this way for two main reasons which I will explore in the following essay.

First of all, one of the major reasons for practicing democracy is to allow any individual to choose their leader out of their own will. When a child who is just above the age of 15 is allowed to vote, the leader whom they chose is easily influenced by the people around them and their decision may not be a personal choice. For instance, until I'm 18 years old I'm not aware of the pros and cons of the candidates participating in the elections that happened in my area. If I were given a chance to vote then, I would have chosen the candidate who my parents told me to do so. As a result, one of the goals of democracy would have been violated. In addition to this, countries like India have many children in the age group of 15 and their decision play a vital role in the final results of elections. I strongly believe it is worthwhile to not allow these young children to vote.

Secondly, young children can be easily cheated by the politicians to cast votes for their party. These children are not intelligent enough to classify things as good or bad and cast their votes based on a candidate's appearance in the public. My own experience is a compelling example of this. I used to admire a person in the limelight in and around my place when I was young. Later, when I grew up I realized that he does certain activities for public attention and they do not really help people. Thinking in this context, If I were allowed to vote then, I would have made the wrong decision of choosing this person because of my admiration. Moreover, if the person would have won the elections, I would also be one of the people who are responsible for his victory that could have hurt the good people. Accordingly, I think independence opens up a person to various possibilities.

In conclusion, I strongly believe that it's very important to not allow the children in the age group of 15 to vote. Since they can be easily cheated and their decisions hurts the goals of democracy

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 346, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
... a personal choice. For instance, until Im 18 years old Im not aware of the pros a...
^^
Line 3, column 362, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
...ce. For instance, until Im 18 years old Im not aware of the pros and cons of the c...
^^
Line 5, column 206, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'candidates'' or 'candidate's'?
Suggestion: candidates'; candidate's
... or bad and cast their votes based on a candidates appearance in the public. My own experi...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 669, Rule ID: IF_WOULD_HAVE_VBN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'had won'?
Suggestion: had won
... my admiration. Moreover, if the person would have won the elections, I would also be one of t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, first, if, may, moreover, really, second, secondly, so, then, while, for instance, i think, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, first of all, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1848.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 417.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.43165467626 4.8611393121 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5189133491 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56255855487 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.479616306954 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 595.8 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.6739050287 48.9658058833 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.4 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.85 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.95 5.45110844103 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.33600262888 0.236089414692 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108426017635 0.076458572812 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122409356339 0.0737576698707 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.265445094365 0.150856017488 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0977374581128 0.0645574589148 151% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 11.7677419355 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 58.1214874552 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.41 10.9000537634 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.24 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 86.8835125448 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.