Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? As long as they meet deadlines and attend meetings, company employees should be allowed to work any hours they choose. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Most people agree that employees of a company play a major role in a company's success. In my opinion, I believe that it is more advantageous for a company to make its workers follow a common schedule rather than allowing them to work on the time they wish. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore further in the following essay.
To begin with, if a company allow its workers to choose their working hours, then they may not be productive. Though completing the works on time and attending meetings signal that they are focused towards their work, it does not ensure that they do their works regularly. Moreover, because of employees that finish their works close to deadlines, often the profit that a company gets decreases. My own experience is a compelling example of this. About 10 years ago, I worked in a firm that allowed its employees to choose their working as long as they meet their deadlines. Within few months, after this scheme is implemented the employees often worked seriously only close to deadlines and sometimes, the company could not handover the completed projects to its clients on time. As a result, their profits reduced considerably and they started losing their revenues. Accordingly, I feel that it is worthwhile for a company to make its workers follow a common work period to avoid problems.
Secondly, working in group projects requires all of its members to work at at a same time. Further, the discussions that happen during that time are often very efficient only if every member of the group participates. For instance, my friend worked in a product based company that often takes projects from clients that involve group work. To encourage its employees, that company offered them a choice to choose their working hours. This unfortunately, turned out to be a failure. The employees cannot find a common time themselves to work on in the projects assigned by the company. Moroever, some started to become neglegent that they never participated in the discussions. Consequently, the discussions become inefficient and the results of the projetcs looked very different from the clients' requirements. Thus, I believe that group works will be inefficient if company allow workers to choose their working hours.
In conclusion, I am of the opinion that it is better for a company to not allow its employees to chose their working hours. This is because, it will reduce the productivity of the employess and make the group discussion involved in the company's projects to be inefficient.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 73, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: at
...cts requires all of its members to work at at a same time. Further, the discussions t...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, consequently, if, look, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, thus, while, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 65.0 43.0788530466 151% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2115.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 425.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97647058824 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54043259262 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76909888782 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.465882352941 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 645.3 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.9215168374 48.9658058833 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.1363636364 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3181818182 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.77272727273 5.45110844103 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266386579366 0.236089414692 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0886882757119 0.076458572812 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0671759208942 0.0737576698707 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169700590221 0.150856017488 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0663681759238 0.0645574589148 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.