We all work or will work in our jobs with many different kinds of people. In your opinion, what are some important characteristics of a co-worker (someone you work closely with)? Use reasons and specific examples to explain why these characteristics are important.
Having worked in about ten different firms for the past few years made me to notice a number of charcteristics among my co-workers. Out of all these characteristics, I've always felt happy and satisfied working only with the people who possessed a higher level of honesty, integrity.
To begin with, honesty is the important characteristic for any person working in a group. A person who is honest always adds value to the company or group in which he works and gets more benifit than others. Moreover, he cannot be easily bribed to get any illegal work done. I have to say that my very own experience is a compelling example of this. When I worked in a confidential project, I always disscussed my ideas with one of my co-workers not even to my family and others in the group as they may reveal it at some part of time unknowingly. I've seen people bribing that person to reveal the details about our work in my absence but he didn't do so. This prevented our work from going in the hands of wrong people and once the work is completed, he was not only praised but also given a promotion that one cannot get very quickly. Thus it's worthwile for a person to be honest to his co-worker at any cost.
Secondly, integrity can be defined as doing the right thing when no one is watching you. A person with integrity can be also be termed as a responsible person. Most of the jobs especially goverment jobs which cannot montior people regulary requires this kind of person. For instance, in large projects where it's difficult for a boss to monitor every person working under him, if one of his workers did not do his/her work then the progress of the project may be halted. In such a case, it's only because of this person the company gets affected but also the other workers who may lose their pay becuase of his neglegence. Accordingly, people without integrity in mind may cause harm to his co-workers and company.
Thus, I strongly believe that it is necessary for any person who closely works with me to posses the integrity and honesty for a peaceful work relationship with me and for betterment of the company.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 167, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I've
...kers. Out of all these characteristics, Ive always felt happy and satisfied working...
^^^
Line 3, column 549, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I've
...al it at some part of time unknowingly. Ive seen people bribing that person to reve...
^^^
Line 3, column 643, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...ils about our work in my absence but he didnt do so. This prevented our work from goi...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 837, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...otion that one cannot get very quickly. Thus its worthwile for a person to be honest...
^^^^
Line 5, column 649, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... neglegence. Accordingly, people without integrity in mind may cause harm to his ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, thus, for instance, kind of, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1738.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 380.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.57368421053 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61187889408 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523684210526 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 558.9 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.2543741502 48.9658058833 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.235294118 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3529411765 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.64705882353 5.45110844103 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269365569161 0.236089414692 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0924281789173 0.076458572812 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0619717082946 0.0737576698707 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171645094297 0.150856017488 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0415549644518 0.0645574589148 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 11.7677419355 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 10.9000537634 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 86.8835125448 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.