In the competitive environment of the school, studying requires considerable time and effort, and studying with my classmates can make me study more efficiently and less stressfully. Hence, I am fond of studying in a group.
First, I can discuss with my classmates when confronting academic difficulties. When studying math, sometimes I am confused by an equation. If I can't figure out the meaning of it, the derivations that follow are also confusing. When studying alone, I am stuck in a troublesome situation. Conversely, studying in a group, I can seek help from my classmates, thus overcoming the obstacle. On the other hand, when my classmates encounter some problems, we can also discuss them. Hence, the discussion facilitates my understanding of the material in a form that I have never thought of before.
Second, when studying gets boring, we can encourage each other and keep going. Frequently, when I am preparing for the final exam, the studying process is tiring and laborious, leaving me depressed and even frustrated. In this situation of a low ebb, I can talk to my classmates. In essence, the conversation may not be related to the homework or the exam, but a video I recently watched or a joke I recently heard. In sharing our fascinating experiences, I can soothe my mood and continue to overcome the seemingly insurmountable challenges ahead. Therefore, studying in a group can boost my morale.
However, while I benefit a lot from studying in a group, choosing suitable people to study with is of paramount importance. If I work with the wrong people, we can't discuss, or worse still, they may reduce my studying efficiency. For instance, if the surrounding people are chatting all the time, they will distract me. On the other hand, if we work on different subjects, we can't share our opinions when encountering difficulties. Therefore, when I prepare for an upcoming exam, I often choose classmates in the same class. In this way, we can reap the benefits of collective studying better.
To summarize, I prefer studying in a group to studying alone since we can encourage each other and discuss together. Although choosing the right people is essential in a group study, learning with my classmates is my preference.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 146, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...imes I am confused by an equation. If I cant figure out the meaning of it, the deriv...
^^^^
Line 3, column 417, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...tly watched or a joke I recently heard. In sharing our fascinating experiences, I ...
^^
Line 5, column 161, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ce. If I work with the wrong people, we cant discuss, or worse still, they may reduc...
^^^^
Line 5, column 377, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...d, if we work on different subjects, we cant share our opinions when encountering di...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, first, hence, however, if, may, second, so, still, therefore, thus, while, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 52.1666666667 73% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1690.0 1977.66487455 85% => OK
No of words: 338.0 407.700716846 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06315193198 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 212.727598566 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529585798817 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 618.680645161 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 12.0 3.51792114695 341% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.0583681138 48.9658058833 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 80.4761904762 100.406767564 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0952380952 20.6045352989 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 5.45110844103 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.356661662605 0.236089414692 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122211131262 0.076458572812 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0907242149993 0.0737576698707 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.254242560804 0.150856017488 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0220950582138 0.0645574589148 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 11.7677419355 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.42 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.