Consider a situation where you are asked by your supervisor to participate in a group project at work. They want you to work with someone who has opinion very different than yours. Moreover, he feels very strongly about these opinions.
Do you think this is a good idea?
The issue of whether working in a group is very controversial. On one side, supporters of this idea believe that both part will benefit in equal manner. On the other hand, critics consider that working in a group is a terrible idea. After a careful consideration, I am of the opinion that working in a group will be a wonderful idea. In the following essay, I will explain with two reasons why I believe so.
The first point to be mentioned is that the idea of working in a group came from your supervisor. Also, it is a challenge idea because you have to work in a team and your partner have a different opinion than yours. Even though of this I love working in a team, because every person could benefit from each other. All parties involve will share their points of view and ideas. At the end of the discussion will be a person that accept the other person’s opinion and the project will flow with excellence. For instance, I work in a big company where all people should work together to make the company succeed. If one of the coworker do not want to cooperate the company will not achieve the goal. Even the group have different ideas, we all have to come into agree for the wellbeing of the company.
The second point to take into consideration is that working in team give us the possibility that if one of the member has a problem and cannot work the rest of the group will support the project. Otherwise if you have to work alone in a big assignment this will be affected due to your situation. I am a vivid example of this. About ten years ago I was working in one of the most important industry of medicine. I had to work twenty hours a day with my team at lower temperatures. During those days, I got sick with fever and pneumonia I did not want to leave and led my job because the importance of this project was more significant than my health. My coworkers granted me, and told me that they going to do the job for me because I needed to rest. The assured me that everything will be perfect. If I had not worked in a group of people I had not been able to rest during my illness.
Finally, I would to mention that working in team have enormous advantages and we have to consider every one of them. Receiving feedback from others is the best alternative to achieve the goal.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 616, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...k together to make the company succeed. If one of the coworker do not want to coop...
^^
Line 3, column 196, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Otherwise,
... of the group will support the project. Otherwise if you have to work alone in a big assi...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 799, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...red me that everything will be perfect. If I had not worked in a group of people I...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, if, second, so, well, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 43.0788530466 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1871.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 431.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.34106728538 4.8611393121 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55637350225 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51005053341 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.45939675174 0.524837075471 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 604.8 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.739506809 48.9658058833 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.9583333333 100.406767564 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9583333333 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.125 5.45110844103 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269799976762 0.236089414692 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0772726418242 0.076458572812 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0569475335475 0.0737576698707 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152118643188 0.150856017488 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0638028792148 0.0645574589148 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.0 11.7677419355 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 58.1214874552 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.6 10.9000537634 70% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.04 8.01818996416 88% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 86.8835125448 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.