Consider a situation where you are asked by your supervisor to work with one of your co-workers on a project. This co-worker has opinions that are very different than yours. Moreover, they feel very strongly about these opinions.
Do you think this is a good idea? Use reasons and examples to support your answer.
In order to complete a good project team work becomes a necessity. Moreover, the success of the project relies on the understanding between the team mates as their harmony will bring success. therefore, the question of having team members which are cooperative becomes imperative. personally, I believe that team-mate with contrasting ideas will have negative consequences. I feel this way for 2 reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, conflict with the team member can hamper work routine of the person, as majority of time is going to be wasted on reconciling the members. if there is any differences in ideas then most of the time is consumed on discussing the matter and then work that needs to be done is hampered. For instance, recently I was assigned a project with other 3 team members. In that team, one person was direct in opposition of me as we have involved in a scuffle earlier. this gave me the impression that the handling of the project will be laborious task. hence, my predictions came true and our majority of time was spent on reconciling the variations of thought and then devoting very little time for the work. As a result, we skipped the deadline of the project and had to suffer the consequences by the supervisor. therefore, I believe team mates should be chosen in such a way that each team members understands each other well.
Secondly, a troublesome mate can cause serious health issues, which can affect the productivity of the person. The blatant disregard of a person's ideas can make a person feel irritated and make him think more about the person who opposes him rather than on the project. As a result, the person deviates from the assigned task and the vexing affects the mental health. my personal experience is a compelling example of this. about 3 years ago, in college my teacher gave a project of college management system to be completed along with 3 other members. He randomly assigned the members and the projects to the students. hence, I was not very much comfortable with my team as whenever we confer for the project requirements we ended up in a dispute. The conflict soon became common and we were unable to proceed with the project. this delay caused me to over think and made me feel depressed as I heard of other teams have successfully completed their project. therefore, I became the victim of mental stress and wasted my time thinking about the team members behaviour rather than about the project which made me suffer. if the teacher would have asked about my choice of the team members, I would not have to suffer the consequences at that time.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that random allocation of the team members is a wrong thing to do and rather team members with better understanding should be assigned a task. this is because it makes the person submit the work on time and because it enhances the productivity and keeps away stress from a person.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 193, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Therefore
...es as their harmony will bring success. therefore, the question of having team members wh...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 282, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Personally
...ich are cooperative becomes imperative. personally, I believe that team-mate with contrast...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 129, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ajority of time is going to be wasted on reconciling the members. if there is any...
^^
Line 5, column 156, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
... be wasted on reconciling the members. if there is any differences in ideas then ...
^^
Line 5, column 159, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[4]
Message: Did you mean 'there are any differences'?
Suggestion: there are any differences
... wasted on reconciling the members. if there is any differences in ideas then most of the time is consu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 474, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
... we have involved in a scuffle earlier. this gave me the impression that the handlin...
^^^^
Line 5, column 559, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Hence
... of the project will be laborious task. hence, my predictions came true and our major...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 822, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Therefore
...fer the consequences by the supervisor. therefore, I believe team mates should be chosen ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 369, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: My
...d the vexing affects the mental health. my personal experience is a compelling exa...
^^
Line 9, column 425, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: About
...rience is a compelling example of this. about 3 years ago, in college my teacher gave...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 621, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Hence
...mbers and the projects to the students. hence, I was not very much comfortable with m...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 830, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...ere unable to proceed with the project. this delay caused me to over think and made ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 962, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Therefore
... successfully completed their project. therefore, I became the victim of mental stress a...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1053, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'members'' or 'member's'?
Suggestion: members'; member's
... wasted my time thinking about the team members behaviour rather than about the project...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1123, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...about the project which made me suffer. if the teacher would have asked about my c...
^^
Line 9, column 1138, Rule ID: IF_WOULD_HAVE_VBN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'had asked'?
Suggestion: had asked
...ct which made me suffer. if the teacher would have asked about my choice of the team members, I ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 178, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...nderstanding should be assigned a task. this is because it makes the person submit t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, well, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2456.0 1977.66487455 124% => OK
No of words: 513.0 407.700716846 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78752436647 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75914943092 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68816499736 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.444444444444 0.524837075471 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 764.1 618.680645161 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.2162762199 48.9658058833 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.4615384615 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7307692308 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.96153846154 5.45110844103 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 17.0 5.5376344086 307% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.85842293907 285% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146717342741 0.236089414692 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0464629412463 0.076458572812 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0262463698618 0.0737576698707 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0940752302575 0.150856017488 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0251179290399 0.0645574589148 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 86.8835125448 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.