A/D? Scientists should be responsible for the negative impacts of their discoveries.
There is no doubt that the state-of-the-art technologies rely mostly on (ties up with\are bound to) the cutting edge discoveries which are aiming to accelerate human life in different aspects. Since we are already beginning to forget what the world was like without them, imagining of a cold, dead world without light and coping with life difficulties would make us more appreciative of recent discoveries. It’s obvious for everyone (there is no doubt that/no one can deny that) we owe all these discoveries to lovely hands of scientists. But as the discoveries came to an existence with the aim of easing human life and alleviating the pain from human beings, there is a question arising (in) here about who is going to be blamed for the negative impacts and paying for the evil uses of these discoveries. At first glance (At first sight) it might seem that scientists are condemned to be responsible for the evil use of their discoveries, but it’s not as it seems. Regarding this, I can tell you half a dozen cases to discuss on the rejection of this agenda, but in what follows, I will try to further elaborate on the most important reasons.
The most significant reason against this proposal roots completely in the belief that sometimes the people are the ones who have insufficient knowledge of using these inventions or even not taking seriously what was instructed. To make it clear, let’s study it through the example. As we know, vehicles play/are playing a prominent role in the modern world societies. Actually vehicle’s invention was an evolution in transportation system in contemporary era. If you have a look to newspapers on your way to home or office, you will find out that high rate of car accident mortality is the topic session of almost every newspaper. For finding who is guilty, let’s jump into teared hatch of time travel tunnel and travel back through the time for about ago half a decade ago (to the era of world's inception) to meet our ancestors’ life. You will find out that people at that time had a hard time traveling a long distance; they actually used animals to take them to the destination or even they had to walk a long distance. This trend continued until the invention of vehicle. At that time, the inventor couldn’t even think about (of) such a disaster can take place (happen) in the future as a result of people’s carelessness and breaking traffic laws or over speeding.
The other reason against this proposal roots in the belief that sometimes the people are the ones who misuse these discoveries and use them in negative ways. As some people have evil plans in their mind, they use whatever they found for their evil purposes. You don’t have to look so far to find an example. computers as a magnificent piece of technology was invented in recent centuries which plays a key role in people’s daily life, was not separated as an exception of these evilly uses (also the victim of this evil use). At that time, computer came to an existence with the propose of accelerating engineer’s nerve-racking processes and just a short later internet came out to make distances meaningless by enabling people to share information and communicate with each other far across the distances. But unfortunately some misguided people use it for their evil purposes like spreading virus over (through) the internet and causing technical deficiencies in other computers or spreading inappropriate pornography contents across the web.
In the end, owing to the mentioned reasons, I firmly believe that users are the ones who deviate the discoveries from their right path of their aims and misuse (abuse) them. They should be blamed for the negative impacts of scientists’ discoveries since they are responsible for the evil uses of them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 413, Rule ID: OBVIOUS_FOR[1]
Message: The adjective obvious is normally used with 'to': 'obvious to everyone'.
Suggestion: obvious to everyone
...ppreciative of recent discoveries. It’s obvious for everyone (there is no doubt that/no one can deny...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 309, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Computers
...have to look so far to find an example. computers as a magnificent piece of technology wa...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 576, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ime, computer came to an existence with the propose of accelerating engineer’s nerve-rackin...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['actually', 'also', 'but', 'first', 'if', 'look', 'regarding', 'so', 'no doubt', 'as a result']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.228245363766 0.229887763892 99% => OK
Verbs: 0.145506419401 0.158761421928 92% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0827389443652 0.0866891130778 95% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0456490727532 0.046263068375 99% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0513552068474 0.0685040099705 75% => OK
Prepositions: 0.138373751783 0.118717715034 117% => OK
Participles: 0.0427960057061 0.0351676179071 122% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.78844530986 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0328102710414 0.0309702414327 106% => OK
Particles: 0.00427960057061 0.00188951952338 226% => OK
Determiners: 0.115549215407 0.0887237588012 130% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0128388017118 0.0209618222197 61% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.018544935806 0.0139019557991 133% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3793.0 2387.08602151 159% => OK
No of words: 640.0 408.028673835 157% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.9265625 5.86048508987 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.02973371873 4.48200974243 112% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.3140625 0.338922669872 93% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.2390625 0.251872472559 95% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.1890625 0.174417080927 108% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.1390625 0.112833075102 123% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78844530986 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 325.0 212.727598566 153% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5078125 0.524397521467 97% => OK
Word variations: 64.7884971163 59.2087087015 109% => OK
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6684587814 111% => OK
Sentence length: 27.8260869565 20.5533526081 135% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.5119146727 48.84282405 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 164.913043478 120.699889404 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8260869565 20.5533526081 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.434782608696 0.644075263715 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.5376344086 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.54480286738 54% => OK
Readability: 51.7323369565 45.7405998639 113% => OK
Elegance: 1.68823529412 1.45489161554 116% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.369771603406 0.300154397459 123% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0807694879579 0.103427244359 78% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0501788380338 0.0752933317313 67% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.481252811995 0.497263757937 97% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.147042345976 0.151897553556 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136003457672 0.114077575197 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.125772484954 0.0781384742642 161% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.470586243875 0.336927656856 140% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0378269614068 0.067059652881 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.313161028275 0.210909579961 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.152396443881 0.0618886996521 246% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8870967742 34% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 15.0 3.86379928315 388% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.91756272401 81% => OK
Positive topic words: 4.0 8.42114695341 47% => OK
Negative topic words: 15.0 2.4623655914 609% => Less negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.75985663082 36% => OK
Total topic words: 20.0 13.6433691756 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Less content wanted. Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.