Do you agree/disagree that to make a subject more interesting, a teacher should teach the subject with relevance that help them outside the lives of a school?
Education is no more a necessity but a race of cut-throat competition that students are made to take part in. And while trying to cope up with such pressure, students should be able to actually enjoy their learning process and not simply study to score well in their examinations. Hence, I completely agree that to make a subject more interesting, a teacher should teach the subject with relevance that help them outside the lives of a school. In what follows, this essay will explore a few points that can help explain the reasons behind my stand.
To begin with, if students are not being able to relate to what they are being taught, they tend to lose their interest in studying the concerned subject. For example, in a search study done by the Central Board of Primary Education, students of the state preliminary schools are more aligned towards studying science-related subjects as they were followed by a display of laboratory experiments, rather than subjects related to humanities.
Secondly, when students are only exposed to the theoretical concepts, they fail to understand the reasons behind investing their time and effort in learning those lessons. Students rather prefer concentration on subjects that they solely feel could give them more edge in their professional life such as finance or science etc.. Lets's say for instance, as a child we never really understood the reason behind studying history. We knew that there's hardly any scope in the professional life concerning these subjects and hence neglected it badly. But indeed we can learn from the revolutions and the great leaders about their managing skills, their level of tolerance, both their positive and negative characteristics that can help us develop our personalities immensely.
Last but not least, when it comes to ultimately utilizing the lessons learned from school, recruiters not only look for academic knowledge; they prefer a student who has a better grip on his soft skills. So it is of utmost significance to make a subject relevant by giving group projects or making the students prepare and give out presentations etc.. For example, s study done by the Univerity of Arizona states that students who were a part of numerous group project or had undertaken a few internships had seventy per cent higher chance of getting hired at the end of their course than their other counterparts.
To conclude, giving real-life examples or taking students to field trips such as to the museum or the zoo etc. helps students realize the practical real-life potential of any subject. Once a student feels the concerned lessons are relevant enough, he is motivated to deeply understand the contents rather than just concentrating on getting a good score in the examinations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 327, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...onal life such as finance or science etc.. Letss say for instance, as a child we n...
^^
Line 5, column 441, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: there's
...n behind studying history. We knew that theres hardly any scope in the professional li...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 350, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...s prepare and give out presentations etc.. For example, s study done by the Univer...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, hence, if, look, really, second, secondly, so, well, while, as to, for example, for instance, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2312.0 1977.66487455 117% => OK
No of words: 453.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10375275938 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61343653406 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81390374327 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 254.0 212.727598566 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560706401766 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 710.1 618.680645161 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.9062848859 48.9658058833 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.0 100.406767564 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6470588235 20.6045352989 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.70588235294 5.45110844103 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243156644875 0.236089414692 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0916117925768 0.076458572812 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.162319198432 0.0737576698707 220% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145033563867 0.150856017488 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113200804235 0.0645574589148 175% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 11.7677419355 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 58.1214874552 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 86.8835125448 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.