People learn things better from those at their own level - such as fellow students or coworkers - than from those at a higher level, such as teachers or supervisors.
We have often got ourselves involved in group studies, but only after we have already received the lecture from our teacher or supervisors. A fellow at the same level of expertise as mine would lack the capability of judgement that a teacher is supposed to have by virtue of his profession. The following points are made in context to explain my stand, which is against the given notion.
To begin with, a teacher or a supervisor who is at a higher level generally has more in-depth knowledge of the subject matter that he is supposed to teach. Whereas, a student or a co-worker who is at the same level, either himself gains knowledge on the subject from his supervisors or from his work experiences which can be restricted to some particular content of the subject, only. For instance, during my college days, I would be having a bleak idea on the subject matter by just reading the textbooks unless it was explained to me by a teacher.
Secondly, a teacher or a supervisor is trained in the art of teaching and mentoring unlike a student or a co-worker. The methodological delivery of education has its significance in deciding which topic to prioritize or which area to be taught more elaborately or which content to be analyzed less or more critically etc.. Let's take an example of a general lecture delivered by our teachers where they would hardly ever read out from the textbook, but include their explanations, sometimes PowerPoint presentations and mathematical analysis, if possible.
Last but not the least, a supervisor or a teacher is aware of the right exercises that are required to be taken upon completion of a considered topic. In contrast, a student or a co-worker can only make a suggestion of exercises based on what was only assigned to them. Additionally, this would result in a limited exploration of the subject by the student who is getting to learn things from the fellows at his level. For example, a teacher explores through several different books and comes up with appropriate exercises that help students to gain deeper knowledge and hands-on experience on the subject taught.
I cannot disagree with the fact that our co-workers gain most of their knowledge from experience which is in no way lesser in credibility that what our teachers already have. Yet, in most cases, the former is unaware of the significant teaching methodologies even if they are good at what they are doing.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd, which is against the given notion. To begin with, a teacher or a supervisor...
^^^
Line 5, column 321, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
... be analyzed less or more critically etc.. Lets take an example of a general lectu...
^^
Line 5, column 324, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
... analyzed less or more critically etc.. Lets take an example of a general lecture de...
^^^^
Line 7, column 460, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'several'.
Suggestion: several
...For example, a teacher explores through several different books and comes up with appropriate exe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 10, Rule ID: AGREE_WITH_THE_FACT[1]
Message: Use simply 'disagree that'.
Suggestion: disagree that
...ence on the subject taught. I cannot disagree with the fact that our co-workers gain most of their knowl...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, secondly, so, whereas, for example, for instance, in contrast, in most cases, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 52.1666666667 130% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2015.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 413.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8789346247 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50803742585 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89503741063 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525423728814 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 647.1 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 10.0 3.08781362007 324% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 38.8367523531 48.9658058833 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.333333333 100.406767564 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5333333333 20.6045352989 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 5.45110844103 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232475928766 0.236089414692 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0835365277681 0.076458572812 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0758355580362 0.0737576698707 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131576554863 0.150856017488 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0460430811018 0.0645574589148 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 11.7677419355 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 58.1214874552 76% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.