Do you agree with the following statement? Teachers should be paid according to how much students learn. give specific reasons and examples to support your opinion.
A teacher is known as Guru in Sanskrit means a person who guides you towards right path, similarly teacher guides the future generation. He/She mentors and increase the curiosity to study in the students. But in todays world there are teachers who are not good and they join school and college just for the sake of money and don't really care if the studnets are learning or not as a result some people think that teachers should be paid according to how much the students learn. I do agree with this, below are a few reasons for the same.
First, people who join as a teacher just for the sake of money and don't really care about the students will be in check. For example in a country like India where most of the government schools are not up to the mark as many of the teachers in such schools are not educated enough and are not bothered about the students. They join the schools for facilities provided by the government and mostly get jobs based on reservations. In scenarios like this if the schools implement such rules then the teachers joining will be under the microscope and there will be scope for good teachers who are passionate about teaching will get opportunities.
If teachers are paid based on the performance of the students then the teachers will make more efforts to make the subject easy so that all the students can understand and learn the subject. He/ she will also try to make the class more fun so that students enjoy the class and learn the subject in this process so, that studies will be more interesting for both students and teachers. For example, physics was of one the toughest subject for me in school until I came across my 12th class physics teacher who made physics easier by giving practical exams for all phenomenon and theory. I wish we had all the teachers like him.
Again if teachers are paid more on the student's performance then teachers will give importance to each and every student, there won't be one or two students who will score more marks in the class but the most of the class will be scoring good marks as all the students will get attention. Students won't have to take extra tuition to get good marks as teachers will be available for them in all the points.
In conclusion, to get good teachers who are passionate about teaching and get the not so bad teachers into action we should pay the teachers on the basis of how much students learn from them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 326, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... college just for the sake of money and dont really care if the studnets are learnin...
^^^^
Line 3, column 68, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... teacher just for the sake of money and dont really care about the students will be ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 490, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'physics'' or 'physic's'?
Suggestion: physics'; physic's
...chool until I came across my 12th class physics teacher who made physics easier by givi...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 40, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
... Again if teachers are paid more on the students performance then teachers will give imp...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 162, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...ld pay the teachers on the basis of how much students learn from them.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, really, similarly, so, then, for example, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 43.0788530466 56% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1987.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 437.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.54691075515 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57214883401 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33628021831 2.67179642975 87% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.430205949657 0.524837075471 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 592.2 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.1344086022 144% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 72.1709082664 48.9658058833 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.466666667 100.406767564 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.1333333333 20.6045352989 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.45110844103 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247045487128 0.236089414692 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0945384273785 0.076458572812 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.068625718247 0.0737576698707 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163661246802 0.150856017488 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0678998003132 0.0645574589148 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 11.7677419355 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.1575268817 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.7 10.9000537634 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.21 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 86.8835125448 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.0537634409 135% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.