Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Throughout history, human being’s attempt have been to establish relationship with others. A controversial question that is often raised regarding this issue is whether the ability to maintain friendships with handful people for a long period of time is more important for happiness compared to the ability to make new friends easily. Some people possess the conviction that having long-lasting relationship with old friends is more pleasant than establishing new rapport, while others hold exactly the opposite view. I personally contend that having eternal relationships with a small number of people worth more. To substantiate my point of view, the following paragraphs represent a cursory glance at the most outstanding reasons.
The first reason coming to mind to elucidate my standpoint is concerned with this issue that from a psychological point of view, people tend to have long-lasting relations. In other words, people tend to be with someone who is reliable and confident. For this reason, they do not want to take a risk to find a new person. This does not mean that people want to have relasion with only constrained population, conversely, due to the social essence of human beings they like to be attend in different gatherings. However, when it comes to have a family relationship, almost all people prefer to be in contact with few people whom they know for a long time. The noteworthy statistics revealed by recent social research in my country show that more than 75 percent of men between 45 and 55 prefer to have family relations with families of their old friends. On the other hand, they do not want to have a constant relationship with people who get recently acquainted with.
The second rationale behind this opinion is rooted in the fact that people prefer to have relations with people who have a lot in common. Old friends are the best exemplary for this feature. To make it more clearer, consider my personal experience. My best friends belong to the time we were in high school. Nowadays, when we gather together, we have a lot of shared memories to talk about. In addition, owing to our recognition from each other, we can perceive attitudes and emossions of each other. Moreover, beacause of the fact that we are in a same age range, we have similar entertainment. All of these features lead to a pleasent relation. In my opinion, if people do not have common features, that is the case in people to whom we get acquainted everyday, they probably would not have a decent relationship in long term.
In brief, contemplating all the aforementioned reasons, one soon realizes that handful old friends are gold and we cannot substitute them with others.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In the past young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives Use specific reasons and examples to su86
- Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion which of the following is the best thing to do Interrupt and correct the mistake right away Wait until the class or meeting is over86
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer90
- Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports Other believe that it is best to use that time doing things together that are related to sch78
- Some parents offer their school age children money for each high grade mark they get in school Do you think this is a good idea Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 237, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME
Message: Use simply 'period'.
...endships with handful people for a long period of time is more important for happiness compare...
Line 1, column 579, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
... that having eternal relationships with a small number of people worth more. To substantiate my p...
Line 2, column 28, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'mind elucidating'.
Suggestion: mind elucidating
...ng reasons. The first reason coming to mind to elucidate my standpoint is concerned with this is...
Line 3, column 202, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE
Message: Use only 'clearer' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
... exemplary for this feature. To make it more clearer, consider my personal experience. My be...
Line 3, column 754, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...ase in people to whom we get acquainted everyday, they probably would not have a decent ...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, however, if, moreover, regarding, second, so, while, in addition, in brief, in my opinion, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 75.0 52.1666666667 144% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2243.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 451.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9733924612 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60833598836 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83739943286 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521064301552 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 689.4 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.573229407 48.9658058833 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.954545455 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.45110844103 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282067960392 0.236089414692 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0887381266389 0.076458572812 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0885060468341 0.0737576698707 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178433527661 0.150856017488 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120530025822 0.0645574589148 187% => OK
automated_readability_index: 12.2 11.7677419355 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 86.8835125448 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.