Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Friendship is one of the crucial factors in human life since it gives people meaningful memories and experiences. However, there are two stereotypes about whether people should keep on with a small group of friends over a long period or gain the chance to make new friends. I, as a fervent advocate of long-term friendship, assure that the ability to preserve it is relatively precious.
To begin with, a small group of intimate friends who accompany a person for long is always supportive to lend a helping hand in need. It is because they have been with an individual in mostly struggling moments in life and together experienced ups and downs leading to the understanding for the other in every single situation. Therefore, they are willing to not only financially support when their true friends are in trouble, they also give sound advice in order to make a person become better. Moreover, not everyone is able to help others without any measurement except for the closest friends. A life-long time unveils the value of a person; most people believe that their best friends go so far as to be supportive without hesitation and obviously they never turn their back in every situation. On the other hand, a new friend is not truthful enough to lean on. Take my problem as an example, when I was in high school, I sometimes did weird actions like making noise in class; therefore, I usually made a bad impression on the teacher, which constrained my ability to interact. Fortunately, my best soulmate bravely addressed my adverse manner and told me how to fix it. He sincerely wished to see me better.
Furthermore, intimate friends make people feel happy and become more open in mind when staying with them. To be more accurate, best friends have the same in common since working and studying together for a while; therefore, they are able to feel any fluctuations in feeling of their soul mates from which they can intervene on time to balance their best friend’s emotions. Furthermore, people can freely express all of their thoughts without being embarrassed from their private story to an ambitious dream that is really priceless in each relationship. The reverse, however, is true when an individual is with another new friend. It is always uncomfortable when having a conversation with new friends inasmuch as people have to create a good impression and politeness, which deters people from expressing their true self. This suggests that people cannot live with the true valuable things if there is the presence of new people.
In the end, if having a chance to choose, preserving a long-term friendship is more reasonable.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 317, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...erstanding for the other in every single situation. Therefore, they are willing t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, moreover, really, so, therefore, while, as to, except for, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 52.1666666667 130% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2195.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 445.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93258426966 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59293186426 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75058933672 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 212.727598566 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539325842697 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 680.4 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.0102675027 48.9658058833 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.526315789 100.406767564 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4210526316 20.6045352989 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.47368421053 5.45110844103 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245280587427 0.236089414692 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.079850281395 0.076458572812 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0585934791149 0.0737576698707 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158602039678 0.150856017488 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0584066671183 0.0645574589148 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.