Universities provides new environment of learning and educating for students who are interested in different subjects. In fact, they can build and secure their future career by studding in universities. However, they should be noticed that, treatment would have happened If they waste their time by distracting themselves through study different major whit to gather. The Idea of taking history courses accompany to the major course is not convincing for me. I feel this way for two reasons which I will explore in the following essay.
First and for most, considering the limited duration of major courses study, Student should avoid themselves from the disturbance fact which cause them to waste their valuable time. On the other hand, it is obvious that learner are already under pressure due to accomplished their major course. Therefore, it would be better If they spend their nominated free time spend with some physical activities which is significantly helpful to overcome with the pressures of their major instead of study historical courses which is kind of dulling. The recent research among this issue which assess the results of studding historical course coincide with study the main major culminated in that student get bored and the quality of their study diminished over the course of study.
Second, it is momentous duty for every educated youngster to keep their mind forward and push their mind to just control the futures not the past. In this regard, studding historical course, which disuses about our heritage, languages, and ultimately the event that happened in the past, lead students to spend less energy to make plan for futures and development. One of my own experiences is a good case in point. During my educational time in university our admissions team decided to offer the historical course as an credited course along with other Couse. What was quite exhausted for me and distracted me from my futures plan was that I had to spend extra time research about special event which were happened in the past.
In conclusion, I firmly disagree with the statements of studding historical courses with main major at the same time. It is not only causes students get on bored and waste their time but also makes students to take more attention to the past instead of futures.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The more money people have the more they should contribute to charity 73
- TPO 54 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state sponsored Olympic teams Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 88
- TPO-29:Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- tpo9Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Leadership comes naturally one cannot learn to be a leader Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 520, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...cided to offer the historical course as an credited course along with other Couse....
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, therefore, i feel, in conclusion, in fact, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1928.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 381.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06036745407 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41805628031 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59491000067 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538057742782 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 600.3 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.6033638501 48.9658058833 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.5 100.406767564 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8125 20.6045352989 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.45110844103 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200293435345 0.236089414692 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.07086416062 0.076458572812 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0439650554404 0.0737576698707 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136346649294 0.150856017488 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0403859285745 0.0645574589148 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.