Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: All university students should take basic science courses regardless of their field of study.
When it comes to basic science courses, there are many elementary courses in different fields. Thus, whether the requirement of taking basic science courses would be an issue for all college students. In my opinion, I do agree with the statement. The reasons for my taking this position are as follows.
To begin with, comprehensively studying courses in different fields can facilitate students be able to solve real-world questions. In other words, all problems in the real world involve different kinds of basic knowledge, which is difficult for students only taking courses in their profession. For example, One of my friend, Jerry, was a computer science major student. As we know, the courses in the computer science department must be related to computers. Nevertheless, Jerry had to take physic courses when he was a freshman. He was still wondering why he had to take this course not until he started to be a computer games designer as his career. In the game world, he had to simulate the gravity effect as presenting in the real world. Therefore, he had to formulate an equation for computer programs to mimic gravity. That was a key feature for human beings playing games as they were in the real world. Therefore, taking basic science courses may help students to prepare for real-world problems. That is a reason for supporting my ideas.
Moreover, basic science courses can intrigue students' interests in different areas. To be more specific, students who are not really interested in their own profession may have chances to understand other fields. For example, when I was a freshman in college, my classmate, Jason, was not glad to enroll in our department. Jason was a hard-working student when he was in senior high school. He always studied very late at night in order to get admission to the leading universities. Eventually, he got the offer from National Taiwan University, which is the top school in Taiwan. However, he could not find his interests in the first semester because he spent all his leisure time to study. Once he had the chance to study fundamental computer science courses and finance lectures due to the requirement for all students, he found his true interest and transferred to finance major from the physic department. After transferring into the finance department, he spent a lot of time studying finance related courses and even doing research projects with the professor. Thus, students are able to find their own interests by taking elementary courses in different fields. I would support the claim based on the aforementioned reason.
To sum up, basic science courses for students in different studying areas can benefit students by evoking their interests and training skills. Students are able to find a novel insight out of their professions. With the previous reasons, I firmly do agree with the statement.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, really, so, still, therefore, thus, for example, in my opinion, in other words, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.0752688172 272% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2397.0 1977.66487455 121% => OK
No of words: 473.0 407.700716846 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06765327696 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66353547975 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78972530949 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.488372093023 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 727.2 618.680645161 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.6003584229 141% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.731891027 48.9658058833 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.6551724138 100.406767564 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3103448276 20.6045352989 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.27586206897 5.45110844103 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.88709677419 246% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290954561291 0.236089414692 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0917616069751 0.076458572812 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0791839717709 0.0737576698707 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.237383262068 0.150856017488 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.069762571178 0.0645574589148 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 11.7677419355 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 86.8835125448 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.