Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Although science and technology will continue to advance and improve people's lives, the most significant improvements in the quality of people's lives have already taken place. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Wehther advancement of science and technology determines the improving quality of people's lives arouses a heated debate. Some endorse the statement, while others argue that the the most significant improvements of people's lives is already happening. As for me, I disagree with the statement. My reasons are as follows.
To begin with, one of the most crucial improvements in the quality of people's lives is knowledge, and the ever-developing science and technology knowledge will increase human being's life quality incessantly. For instance, I am a computer science students, and I know that state-of-the-art technologies have been continuously invented by hard-working and intelligent intellectuals to improve people's life, such as physics, linear algebra, the blockchain technology, etc. To be more specific, blockchain allows decentralized trading that ancient citizens had never dreamed of. Not only that, the development of physics results in the enhancement of motion physics, and new linear-algebra formulas have been unearthed to increase the fluency and beautiness of gaming effects. Due to these reason, I disagree that significant advancements have already taken place, because science and technological improvements will not discontinue, perhaps until the day that the human civilization terminates.
Convenience is another key factor that contributes to the noticeable advancement of people's life quality, and apparently, convenience cannot be achieved without the development of science and technology. As an example, thirty years ago, my father thought that television is the ultimate form of human's entertainment. Nonetheless, who knows that the invention of personal computer drives the entertainment technology to the next level. People nowadays can establish their own Minecraft servers, invent their own mini-games on Roblox, and even have fun with their friends anytime, anywhere. All of the aforementioned convenience cannot be achieved without the advancement of the web technology. What's more, uncountable AI models assisted in the development of face-recognition and intelligent security-checking systems. For example, my country, Taiwan, used the aforementioned machines to accellerate airport security checking speed. This improves citizes convenience because when they travel back home from their business trips, all they need to do is attach their face to the face-recognition machine, throw their bags into the security-checking system, without the need of lining up for 3 hours at the airport. In short, the never-ending science and technology advancement makes citizen's life become more convenient.
To conclude, I refute that maximum improvement of human being's life quality has already taken place considering the aforementioned reasons. In other words, I maintain that science and technology is an ever-lasting process.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 174, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
... the statement, while others argue that the the most significant improvements of people...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 174, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
... the statement, while others argue that the the most significant improvements of people...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 176, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'beings'' or 'being's'?
Suggestion: beings'; being's
...echnology knowledge will increase human beings life quality incessantly. For instance,...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 590, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: All the
...n with their friends anytime, anywhere. All of the aforementioned convenience cannot be ac...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 694, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
... the advancement of the web technology. Whats more, uncountable AI models assisted in...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 57, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'beings'' or 'being's'?
Suggestion: beings'; being's
...efute that maximum improvement of human beings life quality has already taken place co...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, if, nonetheless, so, while, as for, for example, for instance, in short, such as, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 29.0 8.0752688172 359% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2449.0 1977.66487455 124% => OK
No of words: 415.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.90120481928 4.8611393121 121% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51348521516 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.41373248198 2.67179642975 128% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 212.727598566 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568674698795 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 765.9 618.680645161 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.1017664891 48.9658058833 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.45 100.406767564 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.75 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 5.45110844103 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.380140396918 0.236089414692 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109703477819 0.076458572812 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112814772738 0.0737576698707 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.270044047494 0.150856017488 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.144594305188 0.0645574589148 224% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 11.7677419355 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 58.1214874552 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.1575268817 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.94 10.9000537634 155% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.01818996416 120% => OK
difficult_words: 131.0 86.8835125448 151% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.