Imagine you are working on a group project with two coworkers, and the deadline (the time that the project should be submitted) is approaching. The project looks good but could be improved if you all work on it more; however, this would mean that you miss the deadline. One of your coworkers suggests submitting the project in its current condition to meet the deadline, while your other coworker thinks it is better to wait and submit the project after the deadline so that it is perfect. Which approach is better in your opinion: meeting deadlines even if a project is not yet perfect or submitting a project after a deadline so that it is perfect? Why?
For this kind of situation, whether meeting deadlines even if a project is not yet perfect arouse a heated debate. Some people agree, while others believe that submitting a more perfect project after a deadline is a more preferable action. Personally, I prefer the first option. My reasons are as follows.
To begin with, students place an emphasis on their assignment's score. Thus, if I am currently work on a programming group project with two coworkers, and the project already looks fantastic before the deadline. Then, handing in our assignment immediately can prevents us from getting a terrible score. This is because professors are, in fact, more concerned about whether students have the ability to finish a project in time compared to the project's quality. Thus, submitting a project after a deadline means that students do not fulfill the requirements, so professors tend to give students no credits at all. For instance, I once submitted my final machine learning group project two hours later because we wanted to re-train our model and try to increase the model's accuracy by 10%. Yet, my professors refused to accept it, so even though our model ranked first in my class, we obtained no credits for this project at all.
In addition, if the quality of my project is already acceptable, handing in the homework immediately prevents me from being portrayed as an irresponsible person. This is because most professors consider late submission as an irresponsible act for students. That is, the purpose of deadline is to limit the amount of time students can spent on a particular project. In other words, such limitation is similar to a contract; lecturers offer students time in exchange of their grade. As a result, turning in homework late means that students violates the contract. As an example, my economy teacher required everyone to do an investigation on Taipei City's microeconomy. However, my teammates wanted to format our whole report using Latex, so we handed in the assignment late. Nevertheless, my professor was furious about our late submission because he thought that we are irresponsible and violated his "contract". Eventually, even though I sill got some credits for late submission, every since then, I always submitted my project before the deadline in order to prevent myself from being considered as an irresponsible student.
In conclusion, I prefer to submit the project in its current condition to meet the deadline due to the aforementioned reasons.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 260, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'prevent'
Suggestion: prevent
...nding in our assignment immediately can prevents us from getting a terrible score. This ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 670, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to group'
Suggestion: to group
...nce submitted my final machine learning group project two hours later because we want...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 764, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'models'' or 'model's'?
Suggestion: models'; model's
...train our model and try to increase the models accuracy by 10%. Yet, my professors ref...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 992, Rule ID: EVERY_SINCE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'ever since'?
Suggestion: ever since
...l got some credits for late submission, every since then, I always submitted my project bef...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, look, nevertheless, so, then, thus, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, kind of, as a result, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2103.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 406.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17980295567 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48881294772 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02609137393 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529556650246 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 662.4 618.680645161 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.2687116274 48.9658058833 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.142857143 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.85714285714 5.45110844103 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239305460757 0.236089414692 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0742001657505 0.076458572812 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0715431720747 0.0737576698707 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155420580009 0.150856017488 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0548076188858 0.0645574589148 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 86.8835125448 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.