Imagine you are working on a group project with two coworkers, and the deadline (the time that the project should be submitted) is approaching. The project looks good but could be improved if you all work on it more; however, this would mean that you miss the deadline. One of your coworkers suggests submitting the project in its current condition to meet the deadline, while your other coworker thinks it is better to wait and submit the project after the deadline so that it is perfect. Which approach is better in your opinion: meeting deadlines even if a project is not yet perfect or submitting a project after a deadline so that it is perfect? Why?
Whether students should meet deadlines even if a project is not yet perfect arouses a heated debate. Some people agree, while others believe that submitting a more perfect project after a deadline is a more preferable action. For me, I prefer the first option, and my reasons are as follows.
If I am currently working on a programming group project with two coworkers, and the project already looks fantastic before the deadline. Then, handing in our assignment immediately can prevent us from getting a terrible score. This is because professors not only care about the quality of the assignment but also focus on whether students can finish it in time. Thus, submitting a project after a deadline means that students do not fulfill the requirements. As a result, professors will undoubtedly give little to no scores to students. For instance, I once submitted my final machine learning group project two hours later because we wanted to re-train our model and try to increase the model's accuracy by 10%. Yet, my professors refused to accept it, so even though our model ranked first in my class, we obtained no credits for this project at all.
In addition, if the quality of my project is already acceptable, handing in the homework immediately prevents me from getting a horrible reputation. For example, I once did a microeconomics project with a group of 3 people, but we wanted to rewrite the project with Latex, so we handed in our project late. However, we veto such an idea and submitted our project on time. Eventually, even though our project was not perfect, our professor still praised us for both having the incentive to improve the project and handing in the assignment in time. On the other hand, my best friend, Todd, submitted his report one day after the deadline because he wanted to improve his algorithm final project by appending some first-handed references to his project. Yet, his professor reprimanded him for turning in his homework late, despite the fact that his whole project was impeccable. From the examples mentioned above, we can observe that professors are extremely concerned about assignment deadlines, so submitting homework after the deadline will undoubtedly make people gain a terrible reputation regardless of how immaculate their assignment is.
In conclusion, I prefer to submit the project in its current condition to meet the deadline due to the aforementioned reasons.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 597, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to group'
Suggestion: to group
...nce submitted my final machine learning group project two hours later because we want...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 691, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'models'' or 'model's'?
Suggestion: models'; model's
...train our model and try to increase the models accuracy by 10%. Yet, my professors ref...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, so, still, then, thus, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2029.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 399.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08521303258 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46933824581 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83408672016 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511278195489 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 637.2 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.2370180923 48.9658058833 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.722222222 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1666666667 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.44444444444 5.45110844103 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265760286612 0.236089414692 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0981838491638 0.076458572812 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0721339030096 0.0737576698707 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170832667516 0.150856017488 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0355256230105 0.0645574589148 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 86.8835125448 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.