Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
Emotions play an essential part in individual's well being and for the society. No doubt, there are positive and negative implications of fast-moving world. If I were forced to choose, I would definietly suggest that people nowadays are more satisifed with their lives than people were in the past. I had a stong belief that people are more stress-free today for several reasons, and would develop these ideas in the subsequent paragraphs.
To begin with, people save plenty of time due to advantacement in technology. The purpose of advancement is based on making the technology fit in for us, so that we dont realize it and that becomes part of our life. Furhermore, electronic equipment like cars, an internet, an electric oven make our life stress-free and joyful. I must say that my opinion on this matter is profoundly influenced by my own experience. For example, I am living single in my appartment situated in Delhi, accordingly, I need to cook myself daily. In order to save time and cock delicious food, I use electronic microwave, a blender and an electronic stove. Aa a result, I prepare my three meals for the day in approximately one hour. Had these electronic tools been not invented, I would have not prepared my food quickly. As we can see from this example, with advent of technology, we can make best use of our time.
Second, due to competitive enviornment, the companies are using effective programming tools in offices which result into a requirement of fewer man-hours. In the past, employees need to work six days a week along with necessary overtime. In contrast, today, generally in all Information technology companies, employees go to offices only five days a week. Consequently, people can interact with their friends and family members. Drawing from my own experience, I work for a german international company. In this company, I am working as a project manager for several international projects situated in Laos, Austria and Uganda. Thanks to the well established processes, I don't need spend more than thirty-six hours in a week. For this reason, nowadays, people have stress-free life.
In view of the reasons mentioned, I would state that because of fast-moving world, people nowadays are enjoying their life as compared to people in the past. This is because, people have to work fewer man-hours and live stress-free life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 166, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...he technology fit in for us, so that we dont realize it and that becomes part of our...
^^^^
Line 3, column 871, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'make the best'.
Suggestion: make the best
...mple, with advent of technology, we can make best use of our time. Second, due to comp...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 539, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...pany. In this company, I am working as a project manager for several internationa...
^^
Line 5, column 674, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ks to the well established processes, I dont need spend more than thirty-six hours ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 683, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... well established processes, I dont need spend more than thirty-six hours in a we...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, consequently, if, second, so, well, for example, in contrast, no doubt, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1976.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 393.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02798982188 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45244063426 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95125688301 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552162849873 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 624.6 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.4174258954 48.9658058833 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 85.9130434783 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0869565217 20.6045352989 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.26086956522 5.45110844103 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181375315434 0.236089414692 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0546758109942 0.076458572812 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.073192984292 0.0737576698707 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13508258503 0.150856017488 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0545798156101 0.0645574589148 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.