Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
Emotions play an essential part in an individual's well being and for the society. No doubt, there are positive and negative implications of the fast-moving world. If I were forced to choose, I would definietly suggest that people nowadays are more satisfied with their lives than people were in the past. I had a stong belief that people are more stress-free today for several reasons, and would develop these ideas in the subsequent paragraphs.
To begin with, people save plenty of time due to advancement in technology. The purpose of the improvement is based on making the technology fit in for us so that we don't realize it, and that becomes part of our life. Furthermore, electronic equipment like cars, the internet, an electric oven makes our life stress-free and joyful. I must say that my opinion on this matter is profoundly influenced by my own experience. For example, I am living single in my apartment situated in Delhi. Accordingly, I need to cook daily, so I use an electronic microwave, a blender, and an electronic stove to save time and cook delicious food. Aa a result, I prepare my three meals for the day in approximately one hour. Had these electronic tools not been invented, I would not have prepared my food quickly. As we can see from this example, with the advent of technology, we can make the best use of our time.
Second, due to the competitive environment, the companies are using useful programming tools in offices, which results in a requirement of fewer working hours. In the past, employees need to work six days a week, along with necessary overtime. In contrast, today, generally in all Information technology companies, employees go to offices only five days a week. Consequently, people can interact with their friends and family members. Drawing from my own experience, I work for a German international company that follows international standards. In this company, I am working as a project manager for several international projects situated in Laos, Austria, and Uganda. Thanks to the well-established processes, I don't need to spend more than thirty-six hours a week. Whereas, my father, who used to work for the chemical industy, spent 50 hours a week, including Saturdays, while working for this organization. For this reason, nowadays, people have a stress-free life.
In view of the reaosns mentioned, I would state that people nowadays are enjoying their lives as compared to people in the past because of the fast-moving world. This is because people have to work fewer working hours and without any stress.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 36, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'an individual' or simply 'individuals'?
Suggestion: an individual; individuals
Emotions play an essential part in an individuals well being and for the society. No doub...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 167, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...the technology fit in for us so that we dont realize it, and that becomes part of ou...
^^^^
Line 5, column 582, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ards. In this company, I am working as a project manager for several internationa...
^^
Line 5, column 718, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ks to the well-established processes, I dont need to spend more than thirty-six hour...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, consequently, furthermore, if, second, so, well, whereas, while, for example, in contrast, no doubt, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2144.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 428.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00934579439 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.548423998 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96862505828 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535046728972 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 670.5 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.8470408719 48.9658058833 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.3333333333 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8333333333 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.29166666667 5.45110844103 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185782312836 0.236089414692 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0568152050028 0.076458572812 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0752285885495 0.0737576698707 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138088324362 0.150856017488 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0547099812792 0.0645574589148 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 11.7677419355 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 86.8835125448 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.