Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Being creative, rather than planning carefully, helps people come up with the best solution to a problem
Any individual during his or her life with all its vicissitudes has been confronted lots of problems any of which necessitates an effective solution. A decent solution is not always an innovative one; rather, through a well-mannered plan, one can achieve better results most of the time. Undoubtedly, a creative person can find new ideas in order to overcome difficult situations throughout his or her life; however, these ideas are not adequate to obtain the key to difficulties unless they are developed meticulously. I subscribe to the latter idea by which one can have less stress; predict and guarantee the result; and avoid repeating the same mistake, to name but a handful.
Owing to envision of the procedure for achieving the answer, one will have less stress. In a detailed, careful schedule not only are all the probable obstacles considered, but the methods of getting the very obstacles under control are taken into account as well. Therefore, applying this plan can be a shelter for one's nervousness in regard to the provided complete and comprehensive scheme. An imaginative person, however, may present a novel idea to solve the encountered problems, if practical, which brings about quite a bit of stress inasmuch as the very idea is not done by others before, so its way to achieving the desired outcome is ambiguous. Thus, although a methodical method, at first, may seem to consume more time, it is worth doing as it provide calmness afterward.
In addition, a well-defined program with its planned steps assures the difficult situation will be fixed in a definite period of time. A diligent person often contemplates steps in his or her plan which are produced and tested before, and their appropriateness for his or her purpose are obvious. On the other hand, by employing an innovative solution one cannot guarantee the right result since it is not even used by others let alone proven before. It may be true that new method of solving problems will be feasible, but by taking a look at history, a person can find almost no one who could find the key to the difficulties in the ''first'' new method he or she used.
Moreover, planning makes one avoid repeating the same mistake. As a matter of fact, whenever a person analysis the situation in which he or she is gotten stuck, they remember the mistakes that they made before which may be forgotten otherwise. However, in case of a fresh opinion, avoid repeating the same mistake in indisputably impossible unless it has been considered through a complete, careful plan.
As a conclusion, in order for a person to find the best solution for the faced problem, having a decent and careful plan is crucial through which one can feel more relaxed, believe in achieving the very solution, and not make the same mistake. I hope, someday, all creative persons carry out their innovative solutions in a detailed, watchful scheme which would be the best result for over.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 315, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...applying this plan can be a shelter for ones nervousness in regard to the provided c...
^^^^
Line 3, column 120, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...t situation will be fixed in a definite period of time. A diligent person often contemplates s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, look, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, in addition, as a matter of fact, in regard to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2441.0 1977.66487455 123% => OK
No of words: 497.0 407.700716846 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91146881288 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72159896747 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78329769697 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 259.0 212.727598566 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521126760563 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 795.6 618.680645161 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.5501990129 48.9658058833 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.611111111 100.406767564 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.6111111111 20.6045352989 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 5.45110844103 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110908634544 0.236089414692 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0383998686028 0.076458572812 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0340293418515 0.0737576698707 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0684828764692 0.150856017488 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0294366425029 0.0645574589148 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 11.7677419355 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 58.1214874552 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 86.8835125448 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.002688172 150% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.