Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Being creative, rather than planning carefully, helps people come up with the best solution to a problem.
Needless to say, one of the most important things in human life, because of its impact on all aspects of individuals' lives, is solving problems. Therefore, all people have always been trying to solve their problems in the best way in order to gain best results. In this regard, some people believe that being creative is more important than having accurate plans to solve problems. I agree with this statement and I will discuss my reasons in the following paragraphs.
Some people believe that having plans for all aspects of life help us to solve all our problems. According to some sociologists, planning is the most important section of human life, since individuals are able to gain all things which they want via planning. Therefore, these sociologists have posed that having suitable planning is better than being creative to find good solution for all problems. I disagree with this approach, because some problems happen accidently and having and making accurate programs cannot help us to solve them. You can take one of my problems as the best example for this case. When I was master students, once I decided to choose one topic for my master thesis, but when I talked with my professor I found this topic was not new, so I had to change it as soon as possible. Hence, it is clear that for this problem, having accurate plans could not help me to solve my problem. Thus, having carefully plans cannot help us to solve all problems.
Sometimes we have to solve one problem at the moment without thinking about it. According to the majority of sociologists, speed is the most important and clear sign of modern time, hence individuals have to know that making immediately decision is so important to have comfortable life. Therefore, these sociologists believe that in the modern time being creative is more important than planning carefully to lead comfortable life, since often you are forced to make decision at the moment without thinking. I agree with this statement, since all things change quickly in the modern time, hence individuals have to choose the best new options rapidly. By way of illustration I can refer to my uncle's job as the best example for this case. Once he told me, he was data analyzer in one company and he always face different signal from different markets which are changing and he has to analyze them quickly without thinking. Thus, in the immediately situation being creative is more important than having accurate plans to find suitable solutions.
In brief, as I discussed in the previous paragraphs, some people believe that in order to find suitable solution to solve problems being creative is more important than having accurate plans. I argued that this approach is correct for a couple of reasons. First, in order to solve problems which, happen accidently having plans cannot help people to find suitable solution. Second, in order to find solution for immediately situation being creative is more important than having accurate plans.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 808, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[3]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'faces'.
Suggestion: faces
...a analyzer in one company and he always face different signal from different markets...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, if, second, so, therefore, thus, as to, in brief
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 15.1003584229 166% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 58.0 43.0788530466 135% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 68.0 52.1666666667 130% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2496.0 1977.66487455 126% => OK
No of words: 503.0 407.700716846 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96222664016 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73578520332 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57408517597 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.389662027833 0.524837075471 74% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 778.5 618.680645161 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.94265232975 243% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6926942326 48.9658058833 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.52173913 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8695652174 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.91304347826 5.45110844103 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21450221541 0.236089414692 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0805139930479 0.076458572812 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0544418750203 0.0737576698707 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157349723055 0.150856017488 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0310244204698 0.0645574589148 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.03 8.01818996416 88% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 86.8835125448 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.