Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Being creative, rather than planning carefully, helps people come up with the best solution to a problem.
There exists a wide range of approaches to come up with solutions for different challenges and struggles. Developing good problem-solving and analytical thinking skills are of significant importance. That planning ahead and taking all the details into consideration or instead going with the flow and using creativity to find answers to problems has always been a contentious issue. Some people hold the conviction that in order to tackle any obstacle, one must devout time to plan everything; in contrast, others have an alternative notion and perspective that creativity can armor people with more robust solutions to problems. In this regard, I agree with the former group for several reasons that will be delved deeper in the following paragraphs.
To commence with, when people devout enough time to come up with solutions, they can investigate every nook and corner of the issue. Hence, they can foresee and predict possible outcomes of different scenarios and be prepared to cope with them in advance. On the other hand, when dealing with problems with creativity, people may encounter even new misfortunes and bad surprises, all of which can exacerbate the whole situation. For example, once, a company was dealing with employee attendance. Rather than taking some time and investigating the initial cause of this problem, the company just went with implementing and enforcing more strict rules regarding the employees' attendance, a solution which not only did not ameliorate the situation but also lowered the percentage of attendance even more. After that, when the company investigated the driving factors of their problem, they realized that the low attendence was due to the employees' poor health condition, which was associated with malnutrition. When the company provided its employees with better nutrition and healthcare facilities, the attendance rate mounted substantially.
Moreover, when people do not take their time to plan a coping strategy, they are more likely to end up in a worse situation which will need more resources, both financial and temporal resources, to compensate for the loss. On the contrary, when one has the time to analyze different facets of the solution and its expected impacts and results, one can have a better grip over the whole situation; thus, loss of resources can be avoided. A basic example can be repairing a leaking pipe in an old property. If the owner just tries to supplant the damaged pipe or adjacent parts, it can solve the problem temporarily. However, the wear and tear makes old buildings more prone to damage. It is obvious that a more comprehensive repair can preclude further damages and save the owners time and money in the long run.
To recapitulate, planning the solution carefully is a more sensible course of action since it prepares individuals for potential outcomes and reduces the chances of surprises and further failure. Furthermore, planning enables one to spend resources more wisely and impedes resource loss. An excellent example of this is how developed countries cope with the economic recession. Had it not been for careful planning, most countries would have drowned in the red ink and become bankrupt. Thus, who can undermine the power of planning?
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 665, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'employees'' or 'employee's'?
Suggestion: employees'; employee's
...forcing more strict rules regarding the employees attendance, a solution which not only d...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 774, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'owners'' or 'owner's'?
Suggestion: owners'; owner's
...n preclude further damages and save the owners time and money in the long run. To r...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, thus, for example, in contrast, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 13.8261648746 181% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 43.0788530466 56% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.0752688172 248% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2731.0 1977.66487455 138% => OK
No of words: 520.0 407.700716846 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25192307692 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.77530192783 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84560220746 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 287.0 212.727598566 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551923076923 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 860.4 618.680645161 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.8947089632 48.9658058833 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.739130435 100.406767564 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6086956522 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.08695652174 5.45110844103 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296801134154 0.236089414692 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0807931015474 0.076458572812 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0561236926449 0.0737576698707 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178900811896 0.150856017488 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0924424827228 0.0645574589148 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 11.7677419355 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 58.1214874552 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.1575268817 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 10.9000537634 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 148.0 86.8835125448 170% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.