Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
It goes out saying that traveling is one of the most widely enjoyed recreations. After the Second World War, The tourism industry is becoming increasingly important for countries’ economy. One of the heated debates in this realm is whether joining groups arranged by agency travel and escorted by tour guide is the best way. Although there might be some different perspectives, it is my conviction that going on an excursion as part of a tourist group is preferable. I will support this view with arguments in the following paragraphs.
First and foremost, travel agencies make all necessary arrangements in advance. In other words, the itineraries and schedules are arranged by them, and everything goes on according to a schedule. Therefore, tourists are not concerned about accommodation, reservation, food, transportation and sightseeing schedule and so on. Furthermore, tour guides have professional knowledge and rich experiences in certain places. Also, they show us unique tourist spots we should not miss. As a result, tourist can save money and energy, and be able to enjoy their vacation. My own experience is a compelling example of this. When I took China trip on my own last year, I had made the decision to visit valuable sites and historical relics for one week. While I did not have information about the taxi fare and the distance of these places from my hotel. So I could not visit all the attraction places since all of my money was over owing to the taxi fare. Had I joined a group traveling I would have seen all the places.
Moreover, a tour guide would make sure the maximal security of the group members, helping them with unexpected emergencies such as health problems. They teach their tourists tips and skills in order to guarantee security or health. An example that can be cited to make clear my view is that last year my uncle traveled to Thailand to participate in a conference. He made a decision to go on with a tour. When he was talking to the tour guide, he suffered a major heart attack brought about by high blood pressure which required him to take hospital. But if tour guide did not know CPR ways, he definitely lost his life.
In conclusion, traveling has become an inseparable part of our daily life. Based on the ideas that were presented above, I have a preference for a group journey with a tour guide due to travel agency makes the full program of the trip. As a result, it would make our journey convenient and enjoyable.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 633, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (China) must be used with a third-person verb: 'trips'.
Suggestion: trips
...ling example of this. When I took China trip on my own last year, I had made the dec...
^^^^
Line 4, column 301, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e our journey convenient and enjoyable.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2053.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 427.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80796252927 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54576487731 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80641221488 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 212.727598566 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569086651054 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 647.1 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.4033770748 48.9658058833 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.12 100.406767564 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.08 20.6045352989 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.04 5.45110844103 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153063630884 0.236089414692 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0413507731744 0.076458572812 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.045550126327 0.0737576698707 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101151672561 0.150856017488 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0408497580088 0.0645574589148 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 11.7677419355 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.32 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 86.8835125448 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.