Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Children over the age of 15 should be allowed to vote. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
One of the reasons for the development of the countries is due to the responsibility of their citizens. I firmly believe that all the nations must allow voting of their younger people over the age of 15 for two reasons. First, is an excellent way to shape responsible younger citizens. Second, is a unique opportunity to empowers younger people to work in the politic in order to have an impact on their country.
First and foremost, the fact that younger are being allowed to vote is a crucial advance in the development of a country because of this act of citizenship can shape younger citizens with a critic and democratic mindset. For instance, here in Latin America, we have an essential example of the implementation of this policy. Since one decade, Ecuador allows their young people the possibility to vote for presidents and congressman. In this case, is a free vote, but is statistically demonstrate that more than the 85% of their younger voted in the last elections. In this way, is an excellent opportunity to provide youngers with opportunities to participated in the politic of their country.
Another important reason is that is an outstanding opportunity to empowers youth to make a positive impact in the history of their country. For example, the fact that young people can vote is a mean that many of them want to work in the politic field in a close future. In this sense, is hugely beneficial for the country propel a policy that allows the vote for the youth over the age of 15 years.
In sum, I am of the conviction that young responsible and educated citizens in politic are the cornerstone of a democratic and develop the country. Finally, I would recommend that all the countries around the world can allow and adopt this policy in their public policies in order to empower their young people to be better humans and citizens.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 485, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'demonstrated'.
Suggestion: demonstrated
...e, is a free vote, but is statistically demonstrate that more than the 85% of their younger...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, second, so, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1541.0 1977.66487455 78% => OK
No of words: 322.0 407.700716846 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78571428571 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80783300078 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 212.727598566 67% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.444099378882 0.524837075471 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 498.6 618.680645161 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.0986687698 48.9658058833 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.071428571 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.6045352989 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.14285714286 5.45110844103 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125408345175 0.236089414692 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0510178515646 0.076458572812 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0477426369253 0.0737576698707 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0850031985432 0.150856017488 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0308820976637 0.0645574589148 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 10.9000537634 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 86.8835125448 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.