Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Company should pay for employees to get a university degree.
The world, in which we are living, has ceaselessly undergone enormous transitions, and relationship employers and employee is not an exception. In today’s era companies utilize a plethora of methods in order to encourage their hire to work better. In this line of thought, so many people hold the conviction that employers should pay new hires to attend university courses. Others, meanwhile, stand on the other side of the continuum. I, personally, concur with the former notion because of the two main reasons. on which I will elaborate in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, paying employee’s tuition fees is a sort of investment. To be more specific, today’s societies are struggling with a wide variety of problems that dealing with them needs updated specific knowledge. Companies which assist their employee to get an academic degree are, in fact, raising their workforce information to help them back with solutions for projects. In other words, these type of employees plays the role of a bridge to fill the gap between universities and companies and transform the latest scientists finding to the company. In this way, companies would be full of updated expert individuals which let bosses apply, get, and accomplish the beneficiary projects. However, giving financial aid to workers to pursue their academic desires is a win-win situation, and students, also, gain benefits.
Secondly, assisting the employee with their university cost, let work force to own a free mind to study well and work better. To clarify more, financial problems are one of the prime issues that individuals which work and study, simultaneously, face. In this circumstance, talented and enthusiastic people have to quit either their job or their academic willing because of the high expenditures. However, having someone to help them financially is a notable relief. In this way, students have the opportunity to pursue their academic interests without any concern about monetary issues. In fact, through studying with serenity and peace of mind employee would be able to ace in jobs and lessons.
Lastly, s many people, on the other hand, might say companies should not support their employee to gain an academic degree because it in this way workforces would not be able to concentrate on job tasks. This claim sounds completely true at the first glance, but the answer to the claim is that companies always dedicate a budget to bring university professors to their office for a limited time to teach them latest concepts and theories. Why should not they accept to have an agent in university all year long?
All in all, contemplating all the aforementioned reasons bring us to the conclusion that managers should pay for employees’ university fees. For, it would assist the company to own the latest methods and theories to combat society's challenges and because in this way a plethora of talented human beings achieve their goal in the academic area.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 514, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: On
...notion because of the two main reasons. on which I will elaborate in the following...
^^
Line 2, column 186, Rule ID: NEEDS_FIXED[1]
Message: "needs updated" is only accepted in certain dialects. For something more widely acceptable, try 'updating' or 'to be updated'.
Suggestion: updating; to be updated
...f problems that dealing with them needs updated specific knowledge. Companies which ass...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 405, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'them the latest'.
Suggestion: them the latest
...heir office for a limited time to teach them latest concepts and theories. Why should not t...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, thus, well, while, in fact, sort of, in other words, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 74.0 52.1666666667 142% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2482.0 1977.66487455 126% => OK
No of words: 480.0 407.700716846 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17083333333 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68069463864 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82370914461 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 258.0 212.727598566 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5375 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 751.5 618.680645161 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 15.0 4.94265232975 303% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.8388622515 48.9658058833 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.913043478 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8695652174 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.34782608696 5.45110844103 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243072094227 0.236089414692 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0674555380102 0.076458572812 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0548397187755 0.0737576698707 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145282313795 0.150856017488 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0503883323591 0.0645574589148 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 86.8835125448 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.