Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.
It goes without saying that in this competitive world we live in, it is critically important to find effective ways of learning for students. While some believe that it is more beneficial for students to work in groups, others disagree with this, saying that it is better to ask to work alone. I would argue that working on projects in the group is much more efficient for two main reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, it is no secret to anyone that working in the group would benefit students not only in learning the task, but it also will prepare them for being a better team-worker in their future's career. In another word, in light of the fact that whichever field the students is to pick as a career, they set to work in a team, and it is needed to learn the fundamental principles of a team-worker at school. The more they are assigned to participate in conducting projects in a group, the better they are likely to perform in their work project in near future. during working in a team, they will eventually achieve the characteristics of a team-worker, for instance, being punctual, flexible and preventing them from being dominant.
Furthermore, working in a group will reduce the workload and stress level. In this line of thought, since the task will be divided, they could effectively focus on one task to which they have been entitled. In addition, working in group enable the student to observe the different interpretation of an assignment and how others approach the same task. My personal experience is a compelling illustration of this when I had been working on a big project in the group for the first time in college, I have come to the realization of how to prioritize steps of each task and deploy different methods in order to reach the best result. If I had been working alone, I would not have been able to finish the project.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that working in a group benefits students in different ways. It will prepare them to be a team-worker in order to succeed in their future’s career, by nurturing specific traits, for instance, being punctual, flexible and preventing them from being dominant. On top of that, in this way, the project and the workload would be shared amongst all members of a group, consequently, reduce the pressure and providing them the opportunity to observe and learn from their peers’ insight.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 566, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: During
...m in their work project in near future. during working in a team, they will eventually...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, if, so, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, to begin with, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 74.0 52.1666666667 142% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2001.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 419.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77565632458 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52432199235 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75105608638 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.465393794749 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 599.4 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.3623235543 48.9658058833 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.4 100.406767564 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.9333333333 20.6045352989 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.73333333333 5.45110844103 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281131694322 0.236089414692 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11011668754 0.076458572812 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0666333282006 0.0737576698707 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180679137321 0.150856017488 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0686018030153 0.0645574589148 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 11.7677419355 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 58.1214874552 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 10.9000537634 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.