Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
The government should spend money helping more people access the Internet instead of improving public transportation.
In today's modern and sophisticated world, governments have a limited budget to spend on improving societies. In this connection, a government prefers to allocate money to enhance specific parts of society. Although contested by many that the matter of spending money to enrich public transportation is highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded as both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I concur with the notion that governments should allocate money to make the internet accessible to the public, and I will analyze my reasons throughout this essay.
First, nowadays, many people communicate through the internet, which makes it a vital part of people's lives, and governments should try to improve it. To be more specific, by inventing the internet, people do not need to commute to other places to fulfill their requirements because they can perform all tasks by connecting to the internet. For example, recently, my manager has closed the company and has asked us to work at home; moreover, we have meetings through video conferences. All employees who have stayed at home instead of using public transportation save their time significantly. If governments had not increased internet availability, we would have wasted our time and energy in heavy traffic every day.
Second, accessing to the internet improve people's information, so governments should consider this as the main priority for dedicating money. To elucidate, the internet broadens one's horizon about all affairs and events, leading to achieving comprehensive knowledge in all fields. Sometimes, information cannot be gained through reading books and other sources; however, a person can realize whatever they want by a simple click on the net. According to my own experience, my son had to build a helicopter replica for his school, thereby reading a host of books, but he could not grasp instructions. When I searched his demand on the internet, I found the video explaining all procedures elaborately. Accordingly, my son could create the best craft immediately after watching the video; otherwise, he could not complete his assignments.
To conclude, while there are several arguments on each side, I profoundly believe that spending money on improving internet access is a great asset in society. Not only do people perform many duties at home without using public transportation, but they also achieve comprehension.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 179, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ey. To elucidate, the internet broadens ones horizon about all affairs and events, l...
^^^^
Line 7, column 282, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n, but they also achieve comprehension.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, however, if, moreover, second, so, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2055.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 381.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3937007874 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41805628031 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07707383422 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61154855643 0.524837075471 117% => OK
syllable_count: 639.9 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.5500893367 48.9658058833 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.882352941 100.406767564 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4117647059 20.6045352989 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.94117647059 5.45110844103 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306964042291 0.236089414692 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0920362379344 0.076458572812 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0767967798294 0.0737576698707 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18640966094 0.150856017488 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0582279143666 0.0645574589148 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 11.7677419355 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 58.1214874552 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.1575268817 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 10.9000537634 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.62 8.01818996416 120% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 86.8835125448 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.