The debate on the competition between the supporting art and supporting sports has been going on for decades. Some governments like Russia, China, Korea, means generally Asian countries, think that sport is more important than art and also there are some countries are supporting art like France, England, Greece, European countries. When we look at the history of the world, sport and art are always compensate with each other. I am of the opinion of supporting art rather than sport hence to me art symbolizes the relaxing and emotions.
To begin with, art is the most emotional work that resembles like reflecting a person's confidential feelings. All big artist are considered such as van Gogh, Picasso, Leonardo da Vinci, there is a clear opinion that these artists were generally shy and invert people, thanks to art these people had a big impact in the society. Thus governments should pay attention to art rather than sponsored works.
In addition, art is often claimed that being relaxing work. When folk is interested in art, they can feel more comfortable and peaceful. In the contrast sport might be hazardous and stressful sometimes, to make success at the sport, hard work is essential principal so .sportmen should perform really high effort to their work.in this point which being effortless makes art more valuable than sport.
In conclusion, all the given above opinions have taken into consideration, art should be sponsored and supported by governments and rulers.
.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 187, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Korea, means generally Asian countries, think that sport is more important than ...
^^
Line 1, column 403, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'compensated'.
Suggestion: compensated
... of the world, sport and art are always compensate with each other. I am of the opinion of...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 79, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a person' or simply 'persons'?
Suggestion: a person; persons
...nal work that resembles like reflecting a persons confidential feelings. All big artist a...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 330, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...people had a big impact in the society. Thus governments should pay attention to art...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n to art rather than sponsored works. In addition, art is often claimed that b...
^^^
Line 4, column 272, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ort, hard work is essential principal so .sportmen should perform really high effo...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s makes art more valuable than sport. In conclusion, all the given above opin...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 20, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...luable than sport. In conclusion, all the given above opinions have taken ...
^^
Line 5, column 147, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...nd supported by governments and rulers. .
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, look, really, so, thus, in addition, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 43.0788530466 28% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 52.1666666667 54% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1250.0 1977.66487455 63% => OK
No of words: 242.0 407.700716846 59% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1652892562 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 4.48103885553 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69310045407 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 212.727598566 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.644628099174 0.524837075471 123% => OK
syllable_count: 370.8 618.680645161 60% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.6003584229 53% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.7776118058 48.9658058833 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.636363636 100.406767564 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.90909090909 5.45110844103 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.5376344086 163% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233593339929 0.236089414692 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101291042344 0.076458572812 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0626502002688 0.0737576698707 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146274038765 0.150856017488 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0590280322031 0.0645574589148 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 11.7677419355 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 86.8835125448 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.