Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In a group project, the group will be helped more by person who will be willing to do what other group members want than by person who often strongly insists that things should be done in a way that is different from what the group wants to do.
In today's modern and sophisticated world, teamwork plays a vital role in a successful business. In this connection, members of a group have a significant effect on success. Although some people believe that all members of a group should not agree on subjects, such an issue is regarded as both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I concur with the notion that group members are beneficial when they perform tasks in the way that others like, and I will analyze mt reasons throughout this essay.
First, when a member of a group forces others to do things in a different way, which others do not like, it will cause aggressive behavior among members. To be more specific, stating a host of disagreements weakens relationships in a group, and members won't be friends like the past. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I was a member of the group, which consisted of four students. One member always argued about decisions made by other members, so we had a considerable amount of conflict on each subject, which hurt our friendship. Unfortunately, at the end of the semester, we have turned to enemies for each other instead of classmates.
Second, if a member does not accept other preferences, they cannot concentrate on projects efficiently. To elucidate, it dissipates a tremendous amount of time to convince each member in a group; thus, a group does not have enough time to focus on the efficient as well as innovative ideas. For example, yesterday, I divided chemistry students and put them into several groups due to inventing new chemical combinations. I observed that the group in which members collaborated and agreed on the materials which they used for the experiment presented an innovative combination. However, the members who did not agree on materials spend a wealth of time to discuss with each other since they did not accept and rely on others opinions. As a result, they did not experience a desirable consequence.
To conclude, while there are several arguments on each side, I profoundly believe that a group member should not insist on their opposite ideas from other members. Not only does a group without disagreements can maintain their friendship, but also it saves time to focus on presenting solutions for projects.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 60, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a different way" with adverb for "different"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...r of a group forces others to do things in a different way, which others do not like, it will caus...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 310, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s on presenting solutions for projects.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, thus, well, while, for example, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1928.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 385.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00779220779 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4296068528 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98776275175 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550649350649 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 598.5 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.0460892783 48.9658058833 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.411764706 100.406767564 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6470588235 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.76470588235 5.45110844103 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302243115117 0.236089414692 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0912345717518 0.076458572812 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0701170577282 0.0737576698707 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174574714096 0.150856017488 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0474417242165 0.0645574589148 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 86.8835125448 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.