Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Professor should prohibit the use of devices that can connect to the internet in class.
In today's modern and sophisticated world, all people can get benefits from the internet connection. Along the same lines, accessing the net is restricted in some places. Although contested by many that the matter of eliminating internet access in classes is highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded as both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I concur with the notion that professors should not allow learners to use internet-based devices in classes, and I will analyze my reasons throughout this essay.
First, that using the devices connected to the net reduces students' concentration during a class, a professor should prohibit them. To be more specific, getting notifications will disturb students' attention to teaching subjects when they connect to the net. For example, my sister's teacher does not limit mobiles which can access to the internet during a class; hence, she cannot focus on her lessons because she distracts with checking her new mails and chats. Moreover, she spends time either to update applications or to play online games. Conspicuously, her grades become low as she pays attention to her mobiles rather than courses.
Second, using the device which connects to the net provides an ideal opportunity for students to cheat, so tutors should not permit them in a class. To elucidate, learners can gain a tremendous amount of information by surfing the internet in a class, and teachers cannot grasp that they gain this knowledge by studying or just simple clicking. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, my chemistry professor asked the questions which were presented in our books, and he considered a positive point for whom could solve the problems. Unfortunately, he allowed students to use laptops in a class. Therefore, after he expressed questions' topics, many pupils searched them on the net, and found explanations readily; however, I allocated a considerable amount of time to reading materials before attending a class. Accordingly, the students who did not read the books got the same positive points as I achieved, and it was unfair.
To conclude, while there are several arguments on each side, I profoundly believe that it is helpful to prohibit the devices which can connect to the net in a class. Not only does access to the net decrease learners' attention to lessons, but it also is a good source for getting information without making an effort.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 639, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ion to her mobiles rather than courses. Second, using the device which connects ...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 318, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g information without making an effort.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, hence, however, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2059.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 399.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16040100251 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46933824581 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91105535025 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573934837093 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 631.8 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.2100087901 48.9658058833 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.117647059 100.406767564 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4705882353 20.6045352989 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.45110844103 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25026051155 0.236089414692 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0815942842749 0.076458572812 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0874176064926 0.0737576698707 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155692001159 0.150856017488 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0275780481725 0.0645574589148 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 11.7677419355 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 86.8835125448 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.