Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Professors should prohibit the use of devices that can connect to the internet in class.
Nowadays, Internet application is prevalent in the worldwide and it enable handling a wide variety of task in different fields particularly in science and knowledge. The education adminstrator are in doubt that is it right to cut access of the Interent for students during class or not. Using Internet in the classes looks like two edges of sword but I believe that the advantage of the internet during training outweighted of the demerits. I will elaborate my tendency for the following paragraphs.
First and foremost, the Internet is provided a proper discipline to share information and serach to find our demands specially in class for be more informed. In other words, a buch of information will be present by clicking some keywords in blinks of eyes. In past it is very difficult and time-consuming to find our investigation in different dictionaries, journals, books and so on. I blieve that the student could be more knowledgable in class topics by searching some subject to discuss with their professor and classmate. Moreover, the class atmospher is the best place to learn a subject and make a discussion to provoke the studnet's mind. AS a result, a heated discussion and effective class by participating of the students would lead to learn topics by heart and boraden studnent's horizon in the knowledge.
Moreover, it is undenyable some of the students who are not interested in the class, maybe want to utilize internet in unapporpriate direction such as chatting or surfing on internet but is it inevitable. Should education directors take measures to lead unintersted student in their course to right circumstance, it will reduce the uninterested student in classes and unproper application of internet during classes. My own example is a compelling evidece to justify this subject. As far as I remember, When I was in the undergraduate college, some of my classmates do not like our major and they have did not participate in classes's dicussion of reply to a professor's question regarding topics and always trying to kill the time by catting and surfing on the Interent. After a in depth conversation with them, I figour out that they did not like to attend at this classses. Afterwhile, I they have changed their majors and fortunatly are interested to new major. As results, I heared that they very intersted to attend in their classes and discussion and leaves their habits to chatting in the class.
To sum up, As aforementioned, cutting interent not a proper way to absorb studnet's attention. The studnets could learn more descriptive and multidisciplinary by searching their needs during classes to enable discuss with the professor and maybe find theri inqury by searching on the inernet.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-09 | ellen87713 | 90 | view |
| 2021-04-08 | Maziyeh Khavari1390 | 76 | view |
| 2021-04-08 | Maziyeh Khavari1390 | 70 | view |
| 2021-04-08 | Maziyeh Khavari1390 | 70 | view |
| 2021-01-12 | Maedeee | 73 | view |
- frog population 81
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to use printedmaterial such as books and articles to do research than it is to use the Internet. Use specificreasons and examples to support your answer? 78
- bb 3
- Wild tuna a species of large ocean fish have decreased in number because of overfishing Recently attempts have been made to farm tuna by feeding the fish in ocean cages until they become large enough for sale However tuna farming has faced several problem 3
- A university recognized first year students have poor study skills in its university Some in the university believe the best way to address this is to ask all first year students have to pass course on study skills Others don t agree with this requirement 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 68, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'enables'?
Suggestion: enables
...on is prevalent in the worldwide and it enable handling a wide variety of task in diff...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 495, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...my tendency for the following paragraphs First and foremost the Internet is provi...
^^^^
Line 3, column 803, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...raden studnents horizon in the knowledge Moreover it is undenyable some of the st...
^^^
Line 4, column 27, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...e knowledge Moreover it is undenyable some of the students who are not interested in the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 595, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'done'.
Suggestion: done
...tes do not like our major and they have did not participate in classess dicussion o...
^^^
Line 4, column 768, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...tting and surfing on the Interent After a in depth conversation with them I figou...
^
Line 4, column 1087, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es their habits to chatting in the class To sum up As aforementioned cutting inte...
^^^^
Line 5, column 288, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...theri inqury by searching on the inernet
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, may, moreover, regarding, so, while, such as, as a result, in other words, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 13.8261648746 166% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 81.0 52.1666666667 155% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2235.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 448.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98883928571 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60065326758 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98452024436 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.46875 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 710.1 618.680645161 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 9.59856630824 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 20.6003584229 5% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 448.0 20.1344086022 2225% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 48.9658058833 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 2235.0 100.406767564 2226% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 448.0 20.6045352989 2174% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 106.0 5.45110844103 1945% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 11.8709677419 8% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169327596588 0.236089414692 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.169327596588 0.076458572812 221% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0737576698707 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102352312383 0.150856017488 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0262235470777 0.0645574589148 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 226.1 11.7677419355 1921% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -383.24 58.1214874552 -659% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.10430107527 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 178.0 10.1575268817 1752% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 13.14 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 29.59 8.01818996416 369% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 106.0 86.8835125448 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 57.0 10.002688172 570% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 181.2 10.0537634409 1802% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 30.0 10.247311828 293% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.