Do you agree or disagree with the following
statement? Professors should prohibit the use of devices
that can connect to the internet in class
No one can cast doubt on the fact that academic studies play a vital role in students' future; in this regard, professors try to use more practical teaching methods, they also approve some rules for their class. The controversial question which arises here is that resticting students form using devices that can connect to the internet is a good idea or not. When it comes to me, it is my firm conviction that this prohibition can help students in their learning. To support this, there are several reasons, two of which are going to be aptly explored in the following.
First and foremost, the most prominent reason which comes to my mind is that by conneting to the internet students can have access to an ocean of amazing intertainemet, as well as mant chatrooms. As a result, they may lose they focus and start chatting with their friends, or they may play an online game. When a student acts in this way, he or she not only lose the subject of class, but also it may distract some of his classmates sitting near him. When students consentration ruins, they cannot be able to keep track of class discussion, an this may end up having a lot of difficulties when they are preparing themselves for final exams. To avoid such dire consequences, it is better that professor inhibt the use of devices wthat can connect to internet during thei classes.
Furthermore, another noteworthy reason that should be taken into account is that being connected to internet through technological devices in during classes, the device may make some noises from for different notifications, as a result these sounds make the professors distracted from the lecturer, and they lose their speech and fail to manage their time. As a result of this distraction, the lecturer may become boring for students and they will not be inclinated to follow the rest. In consequence, students will not learn all aspects of their lessons deeply and the classes cannot be beneficial for them. For example, a couple of years ago, in my second year of study at university, one of our professor let us free to use our smart phones on class, but after two session he found that because of some soundsrelated to students phones, he was required to pause the lecture for some minutes, which results in the delay of moving forward theough the outline of the lesson. After that he prohibited us from using our phones in order to have a more productive class and do not waste our time.
In short, all the aforementioned reasons lead us to the conclusion that, the inhibition of using internet-connceteable devices during the class is very good both students and professors. The fact that these devices may distract students from the lesson, coupled with wasting time of class which can be spend on teaching, is the reason which strengthens my claim.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 541, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...able to keep track of class discussion, an this may end up having a lot of difficu...
^^
Line 2, column 541, Rule ID: AN_THEN[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'and this'?
Suggestion: and this
...able to keep track of class discussion, an this may end up having a lot of difficulties...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 541, Rule ID: DT_DT[2]
Message: Maybe you need to remove the second determiner so that only 'an' or 'this' is left.
Suggestion: an; this
...able to keep track of class discussion, an this may end up having a lot of difficulties...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 768, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'session' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'sessions'.
Suggestion: sessions
...ur smart phones on class, but after two session he found that because of some soundsrel...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, may, second, so, then, well, for example, in short, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 22.0 11.0286738351 199% => OK
Pronoun: 59.0 43.0788530466 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 67.0 52.1666666667 128% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2328.0 1977.66487455 118% => OK
No of words: 485.0 407.700716846 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69283662038 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73965459529 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 249.0 212.727598566 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513402061856 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 705.6 618.680645161 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.1344086022 149% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 77.7268605036 48.9658058833 159% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.5 100.406767564 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.3125 20.6045352989 147% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.875 5.45110844103 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226852811583 0.236089414692 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0839801856459 0.076458572812 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.062865017348 0.0737576698707 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153641560133 0.150856017488 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.017212637378 0.0645574589148 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 11.7677419355 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 86.8835125448 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.0537634409 139% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.