Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? With the help of technology, students nowadays can learn more information and learn it more quickly. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Technology is the backbone of modern society, and the function of various technologies in our life is in the form of amenities. Some suggests that the students with the help of technology can grasp and learn information quickly. This essay will state as of why the improvement in technology still hinders with dissemination of required information.
Technological barriers prevent access to scholarly articles. In every field students require access to scholarly articles to understand and grasp the implication of the learnt topics, the scholarly articles present novel and unprecedented ways to apply the knowledge to different problems, which will bolster the actual implication and application of a particular topic. Although, the digital print media allows research scholars to publish their work faster, but it hinders with widespread public use due to presence of publication houses like “Elsevier”, “IEEE”, “Springer”, etc. For instance, a student in the class of computer security learns about the algorithm RSA, the student willing to grasp further application of the algorithm in real-world can do so by accessing the recent scholarly works of reputed authors in the field, but the student might not be able to access the work which would be published by publication houses, because of the barriers, thus in the process killing the curiosity of the student. Thus, the availability of the scholarly work plays a vital role in conceptual clarity, and bolstering the curiosity for individual student which is prevented via technological barriers.
The technological growth, in particular the internet, at times provides various misleading information. The ability of individuals to share their view and opinion is now possible more than ever, but this shared information can be misleading and not always provide correct information. Anyone can ask a question on websites like “Stackoverflow” and “Quora” and there are many people who respond to the given question, at times the responses are misleading and can cloud the judgment of the individual, thus an individual who started with a simple query is now more confused than before. For instance, one of the most featured questions on “Quora” is about top foreign universities, the questions typically include, What are the admission requirements? What are acceptable GPA, Scores and Profiles? etc. These questions usually have more than ten responses and these actually create more frustration than remedy. Thus, because of increasing technology the students have a benefit of exposure to multiple opinion and views, but at times they are not sufficient to provide tangible solution to learn quickly, rather they cloud the judgment even further.
The improvement in technology does not guarantee applicable improvements. The above is because of technological barriers and behemoth of misleading information. Consequently, in my opinion, I believe that the technological advancement is not always benign, as it still hinders with growth of an individual and it provides buggy solution to queries which can be used to learn solutions quickly, but cannot guarantee that the learnt information is correct or applicable in current environment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 828, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Etc
...re acceptable GPA, Scores and Profiles? etc. These questions usually have more than...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, consequently, if, so, still, thus, for instance, in particular, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 13.8261648746 159% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 43.0788530466 39% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 52.1666666667 134% => OK
Nominalization: 29.0 8.0752688172 359% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2784.0 1977.66487455 141% => OK
No of words: 493.0 407.700716846 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.64705882353 4.8611393121 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71206996034 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.4275669768 2.67179642975 128% => OK
Unique words: 246.0 212.727598566 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498985801217 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 855.9 618.680645161 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 10.0 3.08781362007 324% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 9.0 1.86738351254 482% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 107.561940237 48.9658058833 220% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 154.666666667 100.406767564 154% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3888888889 20.6045352989 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11111111111 5.45110844103 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170481298416 0.236089414692 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0560684923842 0.076458572812 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0783558504683 0.0737576698707 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116710943734 0.150856017488 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0315702903728 0.0645574589148 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.9 11.7677419355 161% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 58.1214874552 61% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.10430107527 213% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.1575268817 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.79 10.9000537634 145% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.01818996416 118% => OK
difficult_words: 140.0 86.8835125448 161% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.002688172 125% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.