Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? With the help of technology, students nowadays can learn more information and learn it more quickly. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
Recent decades have witnessed an unprecedented growth in the modern technologies. Accordingly, students’ ways of learning have been vastly changed. Present students can simply stay at home and learn a large variety of knowledges on the Internet instead of going to the library and looking for book all day. So, the question is aroused that whether the modern technology enable students to study at a more expansive horizon and a faster pace. From my perspective, students do benefit a lot from modern technologies.
First and foremost, as I stated before, students can learn knowledges on the Internet. In the past, students may have to carry a great deal of paper books to the classrooms on a daily basis, which is both exhausting and hard to find information in enormous pages. With the help of modern technologies like computer science, students can download E-books to their laptops and learn on their laptops, which is a more efficient way of learning. What’s more, learning on the laptops is not only more effective, but also give students a opportunity to come into contact with a wider range of knowledges. That is to say, students can just type the information they want to search onto the website and they will have thousands of results to learn and go through. In contrast, previous students have to go to school libraries to go through tens of or even hundreds of books, spend the whole days and come out to finding nothing.
Another remarkable point is that teachers can correct test papers at a faster pace and learn pupils’ studying situation more precisely. If the test is finished by the students on computers like TOFEL do, the correction of multiple choices will be done in just a few seconds. By the theory of statistics, teachers can have a better knowledge of which part of the subjects is students’ weakness that should be strengthened in the latter courses and whether the pace of teaching is suitable to the students. On top of that, teachers can even know the specific subjects that each student is good at or interested in so that the teachers can formulate a learning plan that is adaptive to a specific student. Because of that, students can receive and digest the knowledge better so that each student will learn the knowledge better.
In a nutshell, it is undeniable that the developing technologies have a positive impact on students’ learning in both searching information and receiving the knowledge. But actually, the impact of technology on the students is tiny, what really matters is students themselves.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 128, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to have'
Suggestion: to have
...dingly, students' ways of learning have been vastly changed. Present students c...
^^^^
Line 2, column 535, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... more effective, but also give students a opportunity to come into contact with a...
^
Line 3, column 668, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to plan'
Suggestion: to plan
...t the teachers can formulate a learning plan that is adaptive to a specific student....
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, actually, also, but, first, if, look, may, really, second, so, then, in contrast, on top of that, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 43.0788530466 44% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 52.1666666667 134% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2144.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 429.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99766899767 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55107846309 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9124006186 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505827505828 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 645.3 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9282875201 48.9658058833 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.111111111 100.406767564 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8333333333 20.6045352989 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.94444444444 5.45110844103 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264749303443 0.236089414692 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0929347308702 0.076458572812 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0575589197574 0.0737576698707 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164098178303 0.150856017488 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0544676278985 0.0645574589148 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 11.7677419355 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 86.8835125448 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.