I strongly agree with the standpoint that you are supposed to cherish the opportunity of getting a secure job rather than waiting for a more satisfying one. It is not uncommon that the majority invariably overlook opportunities which they can effortlessly take, but pay immense attention to so-called mirage. Great chances are that these risk-takers are in vain in the end.
Indeed, chasing for the more satisfying job, if successes, would benefit you in terms of comfortable office environment, high-level wages and friendly colleagues. As an old saying goes, the desire to look attractive is universal. But the thing is, high rewards mean high risk. What if you fail to get the job? What if the job is totally different from which you imagine? Without a secure job, you are hardly in full preparation for the more satisfying one.
A secure job would provide you with stable financial resource which could improve your happiness. Working income, with on doubt, is the main security for a family. However, once you give up the possible job opportunities to wait for a more satisfying one, you not only put yourself in high risk but also embrace your family member into risk. To address this issue, a secure job should always be given the priority. Waiting, sometimes is wasting time and is harmful for your mental and physical health at the same time. Endless anxiety and stress in the period of waiting for a better job would cause damage to your body. Moreover, the negative feelings may convey to your friends and family members, which put the unnecessary burden to them.
A secure job is the first stage to step into a more satisfying job. Choosing a secure job is an effective method to get rid of risk, on the other hand, is also a pathway to earn a satisfying job. By learning and practicing in a secure job, you will accumulate abundant experience, which lay a solid foundation for getting a better one.
To sum up, based on the secure job's advantages mentioned above, I firmly draw the conclusion that taking the secure job is better than waiting for a more satisfying one.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, may, moreover, so, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1737.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 360.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.825 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64195582014 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544444444444 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 551.7 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4056159961 48.9658058833 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.85 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.2 5.45110844103 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.38145361956 0.236089414692 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12824798525 0.076458572812 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0870781152388 0.0737576698707 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.239656438741 0.150856017488 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0280946668155 0.0645574589148 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 86.8835125448 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.